arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2310.01961

Soda: An Object-Oriented Functional Language for Specifying Human-Centered Problems

Abstract

We present Soda (Symbolic Objective Descriptive Analysis), a language that helps to treat qualities and quantities in a natural way and greatly simplifies the task of checking correctness. We present key properties for the language motivated by the design of a descriptive language to encode complex requirements on computer systems, and we explain how these key properties must be addressed to model these requirements with simple definitions. We give an overview of a tool that helps to describe problems in an easy way, which we consider more transparent and less error-prone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Julian Alfredo Mendez. 2026-09-17. Soda: An Object-Oriented Functional Language for Specifying Human-Centered Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.01961

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Expressive power of one-shot control operators and coroutines

Control operators, such as exceptions and effect handlers, provide a means of representing computational effects in programs abstractly and modularly. While most theoretical studies have focused on multi-shot control operators, one-shot control operators---which restrict the use of captured continuations to at most once---are gaining attention for their balance between expressiveness and efficiency. This study aims to fill the gap. We present a mathematically rigorous comparison of the expressive power among one-shot control operators, including effect handlers, delimited continuations, and even asymmetric coroutines. Following previous studies on multi-shot control operators, we adopt Felleisen's macro-expressiveness as our measure of expressiveness. We verify the folklore that one-shot effect handlers and one-shot delimited-control operators can be macro-expressed by asymmetric coroutines, but not vice versa. We explain why a previous informal argument fails, and how to revise it to make a valid macro-translation.

cs.PL

Authorization Revocation for Long-Running AI Agents: Root-Scoped Quiescence under Delegation and Asynchronous Execution

Long-running AI agents outlive initiating processes through credentials, delegated tasks, queues, callbacks, reservations, and provider-side operations. Cancellation, process exit, and credential revocation neither close every pre-cut carrier nor distinguish independently authorized shared work. We define root-scoped authorization quiescence: for each manifested sink, a certificate accounts for every cut-relevant acceptance under the retired root-epoch atom that precedes its local fence and excludes protected acceptance under that atom after the fence, while permitting exact rebind to a current, independently sufficient support. The root-scoped quiescence protocol linearizes a root cut, fences old-root expansion and protected sinks, represents alternative and conjunctive authority as antichains of minimal sufficient root sets, and composes provider-frontier certificates into a cutset over registered old-root paths. Exact channel-token accounting reconciles transfers; missing or conflicting evidence remains indeterminate. Under stated assumptions, we prove post-cut issuer non-expansion, support-sound projection, compositional soundness under exact channel conservation, independent-support preservation, merge-order independence, and crash/replay stability. A provider-free late-effect test suite matches 17/17 registered outcomes. Two cancellation-only and one cut-only execution accept the same class of already scheduled late effect; two cut-plus-fence executions, one restart, and one stale-process execution reject it. A separately implemented checker verifies 17/17 traces and rejects 44/44 consistently rehashed semantic regressions. The certificate establishes root-relative authorization quiescence within its bound manifest and configuration, not global idleness, rollback, or business completion.

cs.PL

Fearless Concurrency on the GPU

Rust has made safe systems programming practical on the CPU, but writing custom GPU kernels in Rust still forces programmers outside the language's ownership guarantees. We present cuTile Rust, a tile-based system for safe, idiomatic GPU kernel authoring in Rust that compiles kernels to Tile IR. cuTile Rust extends Rust's ownership discipline to tile-based GPU kernels: mutable outputs are split into disjoint pieces, kernel launches preserve the host-side ownership contract, and the Rust compiler enforces the same ownership rules inside the kernel. We prove the safe surface data-race-free under Tile IR's memory model. However, bounds safety still requires runtime checks. The compiler therefore eliminates checks it can prove redundant and, where possible, moves others out of the kernel into host-side launch preconditions. On the host, the same ownership contract carries through a composable execution model that runs the same operations synchronously, under async/await, or as CUDA graph replay, with async at parity with synchronous execution. Our evaluation shows that these abstractions preserve performance on high-end GPUs. On the NVIDIA B200 GPU, cuTile Rust achieves 7 TB/s for element-wise operations and 2.1 PFlop/s for GEMM (98% of cuBLAS), on par with cuTile Python. Grout, a Qwen3 inference engine built on cuTile Rust, reaches 171 generated tokens/s for Qwen3-4B on the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 and 82 for Qwen3-32B on the B200 in batch-1 decode, at parity with vLLM and SGLang and consistent with a memory bandwidth roofline sanity check.

cs.PL