arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2309.08431

Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision

Álvaro Cartea·Fayçal Drissi·Marcello Monga
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Constant product markets with concentrated liquidity (CL) are the most popular type of automated market makers. In this paper, we characterise the continuous-time wealth dynamics of strategic LPs who dynamically adjust their range of liquidity provision in CL pools. Their wealth results from fee income, the value of their holdings in the pool, and rebalancing costs. Next, we derive a self-financing and closed-form optimal liquidity provision strategy where the width of the LP's liquidity range is determined by the profitability of the pool (provision fees minus gas fees), the predictable losses (PL) of the LP's position, and concentration risk. Concentration risk refers to the decrease in fee revenue if the marginal exchange rate (akin to the midprice in a limit order book) in the pool exits the LP's range of liquidity. When the drift in the marginal rate is stochastic, we show how to optimally skew the range of liquidity to increase fee revenue and profit from the expected changes in the marginal rate. Finally, we use Uniswap v3 data to show that, on average, LPs have traded at a significant loss, and to show that the out-of-sample performance of our strategy is superior to the historical performance of LPs in the pool we consider.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.MFq-fin.TR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Álvaro Cartea, Fayçal Drissi, Marcello Monga. 2024-06-13. Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08431

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Fixed-Income Pricing and the Replication of Liabilities

This paper develops a model-free framework for static fixed-income pricing and the replication of liability cash flows. The absence of static arbitrage across a universe of fixed-income instruments is equivalent to the existence of a strictly positive discount curve reproducing all observed prices. Linear programming duality then identifies the least-cost super-replication price with the largest value that any admissible discount curve assigns to the liability, so that the resulting bounds are attained and cannot be improved. Complementary slackness confines over-replication to dates that the optimal discount vector prices at zero, and a least-cost portfolio matches the liability exactly at no fewer dates than the rank of the cash-flow matrix. We also obtain generic uniqueness of that portfolio, an interpolation between quadratic hedging and super-replication, and a static treatment of swap--repo strategies. On US Treasury cross-sections the observed prices violate the law of one price, so that a discount curve must be estimated rather than bootstrapped; the least-cost portfolio then matches an annuity liability at almost every cash-flow date.

q-fin.MF↗
arXiv2026

Gatheral's Conjecture Revisited

We consider the Heston model with perfect negative spot--variance correlation and its one-dimensional local-volatility projection. Let $I_T^{\mathrm H}$ and $I_T^{\mathrm{LV}}$ denote their respective integrated variances over $[0,T]$. We establish the inequality \[ \mathbb{E}\bigl[(I_T^{\mathrm H}-K)^+\bigr] < \mathbb{E}\bigl[(I_T^{\mathrm{LV}}-K)^+\bigr] \] for every maturity $T>0$ and every strike $K>0$. Consequently, Heston integrated variance is strictly smaller in convex order than the integrated variance of the calibrated local-volatility model. This strict ordering gives a Heston-model counterexample to the convex-order inequality conjectured by J. Gatheral.

q-fin.MF↗
arXiv2026

Concave Shape of the Yield Curve and No Arbitrage

In fixed income sector, the yield curve is probably the most observed indicator by the market for trading and fifinancing purposes. A yield curve plots interest rates across different contract maturities from short end to as long as 30 years. For each currency, the corresponding curve shows the relation between the level of the interest rates (or cost of borrowing) and the time to maturity. For example, the U.S. dollar interest rates paid on U.S. Treasury securities for various maturities are plotted as the US treasury curve. For the same currency, if the swap market is used, we could also plot the swap rates across the tenors which would be called the swap curve.Even the yield curve can be at, upward or downward (inverted), however, yield curve is generally concave. There is a lack of explanation of the concavity of the yield curve shape from economics theory. We offer in this article an explanation of the concavity shape of the yield curve from trading perspectives.

q-fin.MF↗