arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2307.12474

Definable rank, o-minimal groups, and Wiegold's problem

Abstract

We show that an o-minimal structure M defines groups with infinite definable rank if and only if M defines some finite power of $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$. If no interval of M is countable, then all groups definable in M have finite definable rank. In general, we prove that every definable group $G$ in an arbitrary o-minimal structure is an extension of a definable periodic group $P$ by a (maximal unique) definably connected definably finitely generated subgroup $\widehat G$. When $G$ is definably connected, $P$ is abelian and the extension almost split, in that $G$ is an almost direct product $G = (\widehat G \times P)/F$, for some finite central subgroup $F$. The definable rank of $\widehat G$ is bounded above by its dimension, and the upper bound is strict whenever $\widehat G$ is not solvable. Along the way, we show that every linear definable group has finite definable rank. This provides another proof, and a generalization to linear o-minimal groups, of the fact that linear algebraic groups over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$ contain a Zariski-dense finitely generated subgroup. We further prove that every perfect definable group is normally monogenic, generalizing the finite group case. This yields a positive answer to Wiegold's problem in the o-minimal setting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Annalisa Conversano. 2023-07-24. Definable rank, o-minimal groups, and Wiegold's problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12474

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO