arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2307.10067

The Canonical Decomposition of Factor Models: Weak Factors are Everywhere

Philipp Gersing·Matteo Barigozzi·Christoph Rust·Manfred Deistler
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We derive a novel canonical decomposition of factor models encompassing both the static factor model - where factors are loaded only contemporaneously - and the Generalised Dynamic Factor Model - where factors are loaded with lags. This decomposition features a new term: the weak common component, defined as the difference between the dynamic and static common components. It is driven by (possibly infinitely many) non-pervasive weak factors which belong to the dynamically common space. Through theoretical and empirical examples - both on U.S. macroeconomic indicators and global financial volatilities - we show that, in general, the weak common component shall not be neglected. Furthermore, we show that, by accounting for the presence of weak common components, we are likely to obtain Impulse Response Functions with more plausible shapes than those obtained from purely static approaches. In addition, we provide consistent estimators for all terms of the canonical decomposition and for the weak factors.

Explore related subjects

econ.EMmath.STstat.TH

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Philipp Gersing, Matteo Barigozzi, Christoph Rust, Manfred Deistler. 2023-07-13. The Canonical Decomposition of Factor Models: Weak Factors are Everywhere. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10067

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM↗