arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2306.17467

On the Behavior of the Payoff Amounts in Simple Interest Loans in Arbitrage-Free Markets

Abstract

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau defines the notion of payoff amount as the amount that has to be payed at a particular time in order to completely pay off the debt, in case the lender intends to pay off the loan early, way before the last installment is due (CFPB 2020). This amount is well-understood for loans at compound interest, but much less so when simple interest is used. Recently, Aretusi and Mari (2018) have proposed a formula for the payoff amount for loans at simple interest. We assume that the payoff amounts are established contractually at time zero, whence the requirement that no arbitrage may arise this way The first goal of this paper is to study this new formula and derive it within a model of a loan market in which loans are bought and sold at simple interest, interest rates change over time, and no arbitrage opportunities exist. The second goal is to show that this formula exhibits a behaviour rather different from the one which occurs when compound interest is used. Indeed, we show that, if the installments are constant and if the interest rate is greater than a critical value (which depends on the number of installments), then the sequence of the payoff amounts is increasing before a certain critical time, and will start decreasing only thereafter. We also show that the critical value is decreasing as a function of the number of installments. For two installments, the critical value is equal to the golden section. The third goal is to introduce a more efficient polynomial notation, which encodes a basic tenet of the subject: Each amount of money is embedded in a time position (to wit: The time when it is due). The model of a loan market we propose is naturally linked to this new notation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fausto Di Biase, Stefano Di Rocco, Alessandra Ortolano, Maurizio Parton. 2023-06-30. On the Behavior of the Payoff Amounts in Simple Interest Loans in Arbitrage-Free Markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.17467

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Capital Asset Pricing Model with Size Factor and Normalizing by Volatility Index

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) relates a well-diversified stock portfolio to a benchmark portfolio, usually taken to be the S\&P 500. We insert size effect in the CAPM, capturing a real-life feature that on average, small stocks (measured by market capitalization) have higher risk and return than large stocks. Testing CAPM involves fitting linear regressions. Our goal is to ensure that regression residuals are independent identically distributed Gaussian. In some cases, we find that including the Volatility Index as a multiplicative factor by these residuals makes them closer to that ideal. In this article, we combine these ideas to create a new discrete-time model, which includes volatility, size factor, and the CAPM. We fit this model using real-world data, prove the long-term stability of this model, and analyze the resulting capital distribution curves.

q-fin.MF

Arbitrage on Decentralized Exchanges

Decentralized exchanges using automated market makers create arbitrage opportunities with centralized exchanges, where gas fees and transaction ordering are critical. Existing models largely overlook competition among arbitrageurs, despite price discrepancies being public information. We develop the first equilibrium model of gas fee competition between two arbitrageurs under three transaction reversion settings: no-revert, auto-revert, and selectable-revert. We show that pure symmetric equilibria do not exist, but unique mixed equilibria can be characterized. Using data from Binance and Uniswap V2, we empirically confirm that arbitrageurs face positive inventory risk and validate our model's implications: gas fees increase with price discrepancies and liquidity, while trading amounts rise with both price discrepancies and gas fees. Comparative analysis reveals that under low inventory risk, the no-revert setting favors arbitrageurs in terms of profit, while auto-revert and selectable-revert settings enhance market efficiency. Under high inventory risk, the no-revert and selectable-revert settings dominate the auto-revert setting in both profitability and efficiency.

q-fin.MF

Meyer risk measures

Risk measures summarize the risk profile of financial positions in a single metric, which allows their comparison and supports investment decisions. When they respect common stochastic orders such as second-order stochastic dominance (SSD), they rest on sound conceptual grounds. Since SSD can be overly conservative and rigid, we study Meyer risk measures. Those are monetary risk measures that are consistent with stochastic orders induced by a threshold utility function $v$, where the defining test utilities are at least as risk averse as $v$. The flexibility in choosing $v$ allows to encompass a wide range of stochastic orders, including SSD. Our contribution is threefold. First, we show that Meyer risk measures whose threshold utility $v$ is CARA admit a lower envelope representation via adjusted risk measures, and analyse how they extend and compare to classical risk measures. Second, we show that monotone additive statistics, recently introduced in decision theory, are Meyer risk measures under mild conditions. Third, impossibility results for the situation beyond the CARA class establish that monetary risk measures compatible to the associated stochastic orders either fail to exist or cannot satisfy key properties simultaneously. Throughout, we highlight practical implications, for example to portfolio selection and risk management.

q-fin.MF