arXiv · 2305.11806
The Inside Story: Towards Better Understanding of Machine Translation Neural Evaluation Metrics
Abstract
Neural metrics for machine translation evaluation, such as COMET, exhibit significant improvements in their correlation with human judgments, as compared to traditional metrics based on lexical overlap, such as BLEU. Yet, neural metrics are, to a great extent, "black boxes" returning a single sentence-level score without transparency about the decision-making process. In this work, we develop and compare several neural explainability methods and demonstrate their effectiveness for interpreting state-of-the-art fine-tuned neural metrics. Our study reveals that these metrics leverage token-level information that can be directly attributed to translation errors, as assessed through comparison of token-level neural saliency maps with Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) annotations and with synthetically-generated critical translation errors. To ease future research, we release our code at: https://github.com/Unbabel/COMET/tree/explainable-metrics.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Ricardo Rei, Nuno M. Guerreiro, Marcos Treviso, Luisa Coheur, Alon Lavie, André F. T. Martins. 2023-05-19. The Inside Story: Towards Better Understanding of Machine Translation Neural Evaluation Metrics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11806
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.