arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.06452

A Near-Optimal Deterministic Distributed Synchronizer

Mohsen Ghaffari·Anton Trygub
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We provide the first deterministic distributed synchronizer with near-optimal time complexity and message complexity overheads. Concretely, given any distributed algorithm $\mathcal{A}$ that has time complexity $T$ and message complexity $M$ in the synchronous message-passing model (subject to some care in defining the model), the synchronizer provides a distributed algorithm $\mathcal{A}'$ that runs in the asynchronous message-passing model with time complexity $T \cdot poly(\log n)$ and message complexity $(M+m)\cdot poly(\log n)$. Here, $n$ and $m$ denote the number of nodes and edges in the network, respectively. The synchronizer is deterministic in the sense that if algorithm $\mathcal{A}$ is deterministic, then so is algorithm $\mathcal{A}'$. Previously, only a randomized synchronizer with near-optimal overheads was known by seminal results of Awerbuch, Patt-Shamir, Peleg, and Saks [STOC 1992] and Awerbuch and Peleg [FOCS 1990]. We also point out and fix some inaccuracies in these prior works. As concrete applications of our synchronizer, we resolve some longstanding and fundamental open problems in distributed algorithms: we get the first asynchronous deterministic distributed algorithms with near-optimal time and message complexities for leader election, breadth-first search tree, and minimum spanning tree computations: these all have message complexity $\tilde{O}(m)$ message complexity. The former two have $\tilde{O}(D)$ time complexity, where $D$ denotes the network diameter, and the latter has $\tilde{O}(D+\sqrt{n})$ time complexity. All these bounds are optimal up to logarithmic factors. Previously all such near-optimal algorithms were either restricted to the synchronous setting or required randomization.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mohsen Ghaffari, Anton Trygub. 2023-05-10. A Near-Optimal Deterministic Distributed Synchronizer. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.06452

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗