Ordering the universe with naked-eye observations

Abstract

The geocentric universe, in its most developed form as set out by Ptolemy, was a remarkably successful and coherent theory. It did not, however, specify the order of the planets, that is, which was closer to Earth and which farther away. One would naively think that seeing one planet pass in front of another would settle the matter. In practice such mutual phenomena happen too rarely for them to have been useful. Even in principle, it turns out that most naked-eye observations of a central event would show nothing conclusive, with the exception of some occultations by Venus that would demonstrate it to be the lowest (nearest) planet. However, if one's theory were good enough to allow conclusions from {\it not} seeing changes, one could find that Mars is probably lower than Jupiter and Saturn, and possibly that the overall order is Venus-Mars-Jupiter-Saturn-Mercury.