arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.05751

What is mature and what is still emerging in the cryptocurrency market?

Stanisław Drożdż·Jarosław Kwapień·Marcin Wątorek
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In relation to the traditional financial markets, the cryptocurrency market is a recent invention and the trading dynamics of all its components are readily recorded and stored. This fact opens up a unique opportunity to follow the multidimensional trajectory of its development since inception up to the present time. Several main characteristics commonly recognized as financial stylized facts of mature markets were quantitatively studied here. In particular, it is shown that the return distributions, volatility clustering effects, and even temporal multifractal correlations for a few highest-capitalization cryptocurrencies largely follow those of the well-established financial markets. The smaller cryptocurrencies are somewhat deficient in this regard, however. They are also not as highly cross-correlated among themselves and with other financial markets as the large cryptocurrencies. Quite generally, the volume V impact on price changes R appears to be much stronger on the cryptocurrency market than in the mature stock markets, and scales as $R(V) \sim V^α$ with $α\gtrsim 1$.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.STcs.CEstat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stanisław Drożdż, Jarosław Kwapień, Marcin Wątorek. 2023-05-09. What is mature and what is still emerging in the cryptocurrency market?. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25050772

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Endogenous Constraint: Hysteresis, Stagflation, and the Structural Inhibition of Monetary Velocity in the Bitcoin Network (2016-2025)

Bitcoin operates as a macroeconomic paradox: it combines a strictly predetermined, inelastic monetary issuance schedule with a stochastic, highly elastic demand for scarce block space. This paper empirically validates the Endogenous Constraint Hypothesis, positing that protocol-level throughput limits generate a non-linear negative feedback loop between network friction and base-layer monetary velocity. Using a verified Transaction Cost Index (TCI) derived from Blockchain.com on-chain data and Hansen's (2000) threshold regression, we identify a definitive structural break at the 90th percentile of friction (TCI ~ 1.63). The analysis reveals a bifurcation in network utility: while the network exhibits robust velocity growth of +15.44% during normal regimes, this collapses to +6.06% during shock regimes, yielding a statistically significant Net Utility Contraction of -9.39% (p = 0.012). Crucially, Instrumental Variable (IV) tests utilizing Hashrate Variation as a supply-side instrument fail to detect a significant relationship in a linear specification (p=0.196), confirming that the velocity constraint is strictly a regime-switching phenomenon rather than a continuous linear function. Furthermore, we document a "Crypto Multiplier" inversion: high friction correlates with a +8.03% increase in capital concentration per entity, suggesting that congestion forces a substitution from active velocity to speculative hoarding.

q-fin.ST↗
arXiv2026

Wasserstein-Barycentric Interaction Fields for Spatial Factor Models: Evidence from Language-Model Representations

Spatial asset-pricing models take the structure of inter-firm interaction as given. We infer that structure from firms' information environments using language-model representations. Each firm is represented as a distribution of news-article embeddings, and a target-anchored Wasserstein barycentric reconstruction selects, for every firm, the weighted combination of other firms whose information footprints jointly reconstruct its own. The resulting directed peer field enters a quadratic exposure-adjustment model in which the spatial coefficient indexes alignment with information peers relative to stand-alone exposure. Using fields built from 2018-2022 news and frozen before 2023-2026 returns, we find that the constructed field organizes cross-sectional return dependence beyond the Fama-French five factors and momentum and raises the held-out mean Gaussian quasi-log score relative to a matched factor-only model. Because factor betas are unchanged, the gain lies in residual covariance. The field outperforms pairwise distance weighting and equal weighting of the same peers, and remains incrementally informative beside persistent news co-mentions under the primary factor-conditioned specification. Linear and quadratic transport generate nearly identical peer-return signals and equivalent held-out predictive performance. The barycentric-proximity ordering persists across alternative embedding models, and a pre-period encoder preserves the held-out advantage under the primary specification. Language-model representations thus serve as a measurement instrument for latent inter-firm information structure in capital markets.

q-fin.ST↗
arXiv2026

Stealing profits: Spread-based temporal hierarchy forecasting for day-ahead electricity markets

Day-ahead electricity price forecasts support trading and storage decisions, but for battery arbitrage predicting intraday price spreads is more relevant than predicting individual hourly prices. Here we show that a temporal hierarchy forecasting (THieF) framework that jointly reconciles forecasts of hourly electricity prices and all intraday price spreads consistently improves performance across two major European electricity markets and three different forecasting architectures. Using five years of out-of-sample data from Germany and Spain, we obtain accuracy improvements of up to 19.7% and profit gains of up to 10.4% relative to unreconciled hourly price forecasts. The gains persist even for a highly accurate pretrained TabPFN foundation model. Our results demonstrate that exploiting coherent relationships between economically relevant forecasting targets can improve both predictive accuracy and decision value, and that better statistical forecasts do not necessarily imply better economic decisions.

q-fin.ST↗