arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.05035

Kalmár-style constructive completeness proofs for classical positive propositional calculi

Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We shall settle the completeness of some classical positive propositional calculi (positive propositional calculi in which the so-called Peirce's law holds) by resorting to a close adaptation of Kalmar's completeness proof procedure. First of all, we shall employ this adaptation to establish the completeness of the most familiar axiomatic characterization of the classical logic of material implication and disjunction. Next, we shall demonstrate that the completeness of the so-called classical positive propositional calculus can be proved either through essentially the same adaptation of Kalmar's procedure or as an immediate consequence of the conjunction of our first result and the circumstance of each positive formula being reducible to a syntactically and semantically equivalent one exhibiting a particular normal form. Finally, by defining disjunction in terms of material implication and so mirroring the classical calculus of material implication and disjunction in the classical implicative calculus, the completeness of the latter, as well as the completeness of the classical calculus of material implication and conjunction, will be shown to follow from the completeness of the former in quite simple and direct ways. It is worth noting that all these completeness proofs will be constructive, that is to say, we can easily extract from each of them an effective method for producing formal deductions of all theses of the axiomatic system concerned.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos. 2023-05-08. Kalmár-style constructive completeness proofs for classical positive propositional calculi. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05035

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗