Randomized algorithms for fully online multiprocessor scheduling with testing

Mingyang Gong; Zhi-Zhong Chen; Guohui Lin; Lusheng Wang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.01605

Randomized algorithms for fully online multiprocessor scheduling with testing

Mingyang Gong·Zhi-Zhong Chen·Guohui Lin·Lusheng Wang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We contribute the first randomized algorithm that is an integration of arbitrarily many deterministic algorithms for the fully online multiprocessor scheduling with testing problem. When there are two machines, we show that with two component algorithms its expected competitive ratio is already strictly smaller than the best proven deterministic competitive ratio lower bound. Such algorithmic results are rarely seen in the literature. Multiprocessor scheduling is one of the first combinatorial optimization problems that have received numerous studies. Recently, several research groups examined its testing variant, in which each job $J_j$ arrives with an upper bound $u_j$ on the processing time and a testing operation of length $t_j$; one can choose to execute $J_j$ for $u_j$ time, or to test $J_j$ for $t_j$ time to obtain the exact processing time $p_j$ followed by immediately executing the job for $p_j$ time. Our target problem is the fully online version, in which the jobs arrive in sequence so that the testing decision needs to be made at the job arrival as well as the designated machine. We propose an expected $(\sqrt{\varphi + 3} + 1) (\approx 3.1490)$-competitive randomized algorithm as a non-uniform probability distribution over arbitrarily many deterministic algorithms, where $\varphi = \frac {\sqrt{5} + 1}2$ is the Golden ratio. When there are two machines, we show that our randomized algorithm based on two deterministic algorithms is already expected $\frac {3 \varphi + 3 \sqrt{13 - 7\varphi}}4 (\approx 2.1839)$-competitive. Besides, we use Yao's principle to prove lower bounds of $1.6682$ and $1.6522$ on the expected competitive ratio for any randomized algorithm at the presence of at least three machines and only two machines, respectively, and prove a lower bound of $2.2117$ on the competitive ratio for any deterministic algorithm when there are only two machines.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Mingyang Gong, Zhi-Zhong Chen, Guohui Lin, Lusheng Wang. 2023-05-02. Randomized algorithms for fully online multiprocessor scheduling with testing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01605

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗