arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2305.00818

On-demand Mobility-as-a-Service platform assignment games with guaranteed stable outcomes

Bingqing Liu·Joseph Y. J. Chow
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) systems are two-sided markets, with two mutually exclusive sets of agents, i.e., travelers/users and operators, forming a mobility ecosystem in which multiple operators compete or cooperate to serve customers under a governing platform provider. This study proposes a MaaS platform equilibrium model based on many-to-many assignment games incorporating both fixed-route transit services and mobility-on-demand (MOD) services. The matching problem is formulated as a convex multicommodity flow network design problem under congestion that captures the cost of accessing MOD services. The local stability conditions reflect a generalization of Wardrop's principles that include operators' decisions. Due to the presence of congestion, the problem may result in non-stable designs, and a subsidy mechanism from the platform is proposed to guarantee local stability. A new exact solution algorithm to the matching problem is proposed based on a branch and bound framework with a Frank-Wolfe algorithm integrated with Lagrangian relaxation and subgradient optimization, which guarantees the optimality of the matching problem but not stability. A heuristic which integrates stability conditions and subsidy design is proposed, which reaches either an optimal MaaS platform equilibrium solution with global stability, or a feasible locally stable solution that may require subsidy. For the heuristic, a worst-case bound and condition for obtaining an exact solution are both identified. An expanded Sioux Falls network test with 82 nodes and 748 links derives generalizable insights about the model for coopetitive interdependencies between operators sharing the platform, handling congestion effects in MOD services, effects of local stability on investment impacts, and illustrating inequities that may arise under heterogeneous populations.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bingqing Liu, Joseph Y. J. Chow. 2024-06-21. On-demand Mobility-as-a-Service platform assignment games with guaranteed stable outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2024.103060

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Control and Bribery in Stable Marriage and Stable Roommates: A Complete Complexity Landscape

We study control and bribery problems for stable matchings: A central authority (the controller, resp. briber) may add agents, delete agents, delete acceptable pairs, swap two adjacent agents in some agent's preference list, or arbitrarily reorder some agent's preference list, in an instance of Stable Marriage or Stable Roommates. We extend previous work on control and bribery in stable matchings by Boehmer et al. [8]. We consider goals capturing individual and pair inclusion, stability, and uniqueness requirements: Matching a designated agent (MA), matching a designated pair (MP), realizing a stable matching consistent with a given matching (MS), making a given matching the unique stable matching (USM), or guaranteeing that a stable (resp. perfect and stable) matching exists ($\exists$SM/$\exists$PSM). We provide a unified complexity map for all non-trivial action-goal combinations in both settings, consolidating known results and extending the study to the roommates model, where stable matchings need not exist.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

How a Cooperative-Override Circuit Suppresses Nash Play in Large Language Models

On the named Prisoner's Dilemma under direct prompting, three larger instruction-tuned models, Llama-3-70B, Qwen2.5-32B, and Qwen2.5-72B, lock at full cooperation, the metric's maximum distance from Nash with zero variance across replicates, while Llama-3-8B plays near-Nash. Opening the models, a logit-lens analysis finds a distributed cooperative override. Intermediate readouts lean toward the Nash action through roughly three quarters of network depth before a late surge toward cooperation, and the final layer settles the contest. The size of that final correction, not the surge, rank-matches chain-of-thought behavior across scale and two architectures. In the 8B the override is a single causally controllable direction in the residual stream; steering it dials the decision, and clamping its component at one position of one layer moves the choice strictly monotonically, Spearman rho = 1.000, with generation fluent. The circuit is lexical. It survives name removal and payoff rescaling but disengages when Cooperate and Defect are replaced with neutral labels, and on 48 payoff-random games with neutral surfaces no model locks cooperative on any dilemma or shows general equilibrium competence. In mixed-model populations a single Nash-playing agent collapses cooperation contagiously. What suppresses Nash play in large language models is a word-triggered circuit rather than missing competence, and it can be measured, bounded, and controlled.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Auction Design with ROI-Constrained Bidders: Truthfulness and Revenue Maximization

The return-on-investment (ROI) constraint is central to many auctions, particularly in online advertising, where a bidder is unwilling to pay more than a fixed fraction of the value obtained. We study truthful and revenue-maximizing auctions for ROI-constrained bidders. We first characterize truthful auctions when both valuations and ROI constraints are private, showing that the allocation rule uniquely determines the payment rule. Building on this characterization, for multiple bidders we introduce $σ$-increment mechanisms that resemble Myerson's optimal mechanism~\cite{journals/mor/Myerson81}; as $σ$ vanishes, these mechanisms become asymptotically optimal among deterministic truthful mechanisms, and their revenue approaches at least a $1/\bar r$ fraction of the optimal expected revenue over all truthful mechanisms, where $\bar r$ is the largest possible ROI constraint. In the single-bidder setting, we prove that every truthful auction can be replaced by a convex pricing function with weakly higher payments for every type, and we derive the optimal pricing functions when either the valuation or the ROI constraint is public.

cs.GT↗