arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2304.08813

Low-rank covariance matrix estimation for factor analysis in anisotropic noise: application to array processing and portfolio selection

Petre Stoica·Prabhu Babu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Factor analysis (FA) or principal component analysis (PCA) models the covariance matrix of the observed data as R = SS' + {\Sigma}, where SS' is the low-rank covariance matrix of the factors (aka latent variables) and {\Sigma} is the diagonal matrix of the noise. When the noise is anisotropic (aka nonuniform in the signal processing literature and heteroscedastic in the statistical literature), the diagonal elements of {\Sigma} cannot be assumed to be identical and they must be estimated jointly with the elements of SS'. The problem of estimating SS' and {\Sigma} in the above covariance model is the central theme of the present paper. After stating this problem in a more formal way, we review the main existing algorithms for solving it. We then go on to show that these algorithms have reliability issues (such as lack of convergence or convergence to infeasible solutions) and therefore they may not be the best possible choice for practical applications. Next we explain how to modify one of these algorithms to improve its convergence properties and we also introduce a new method that we call FAAN (Factor Analysis for Anisotropic Noise). FAAN is a coordinate descent algorithm that iteratively maximizes the normal likelihood function, which is easy to implement in a numerically efficient manner and has excellent convergence properties as illustrated by the numerical examples presented in the paper. Out of the many possible applications of FAAN we focus on the following two: direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation using array signal processing techniques and portfolio selection for financial asset management.

Explore related subjects

stat.MEeess.SP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Petre Stoica, Prabhu Babu. 2023-04-18. Low-rank covariance matrix estimation for factor analysis in anisotropic noise: application to array processing and portfolio selection. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2023.3273116

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗