arXiv · 2304.08008
Unlocking Democratic Efficiency: How Coordinated Outcome-Contingent Promises Shape Decisions
Abstract
We consider a committee voting on whether to adopt a reform under a quota rule, where members differ in how much they value the reform some supporting it, others opposing it. We examine how members can influence each other's votes through coordinated non-negative transfer promises, made prior to voting and contingent on the vote outcome. In equilibrium, these transfers are structured to prevent any coalition from profitably deviating in a coordinated way, while minimizing total transfers. We provide a complete characterization of these `strong' equilibria and show that they exist, are indeterminate, efficient, and involve transfers from high- to low-utility members. Such transfers prevent opponents from swaying less enthusiastic supporters and may be directed not only to opponents but also to lukewarm supporters.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Ali Lazrak, Jianfeng Zhang. 2023-04-17. Unlocking Democratic Efficiency: How Coordinated Outcome-Contingent Promises Shape Decisions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08008
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.