arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2304.02956

SwarmGear: Heterogeneous Swarm of Drones with Reconfigurable Leader Drone and Virtual Impedance Links for Multi-Robot Inspection

Zhanibek Darush·Mikhail Martynov·Aleksey Fedoseev·Aleksei Shcherbak·Dzmitry Tsetserukou
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The continuous monitoring by drone swarms remains a challenging problem due to the lack of power supply and the inability of drones to land on uneven surfaces. Heterogeneous swarms, including ground and aerial vehicles, can support longer inspections and carry a higher number of sensors on board. However, their capabilities are limited by the mobility of wheeled and legged robots in a cluttered environment. In this paper, we propose a novel concept for autonomous inspection that we call SwarmGear. SwarmGear utilizes a heterogeneous swarm that investigates the environment in a leader-follower formation. The leader drone is able to land on rough terrain and traverse it by four compliant robotic legs, possessing both the functionalities of an aerial and mobile robot. To preserve the formation of the swarm during its motion, virtual impedance links were developed between the leader and the follower drones. We evaluated experimentally the accuracy of the hybrid leader drone's ground locomotion. By changing the step parameters, the optimal step configuration was found. Two types of gaits were evaluated. The experiments revealed low crosstrack error (mean of 2 cm and max of 4.8 cm) and the ability of the leader drone to move with a 190 mm step length and a 3 degree standard yaw deviation. Four types of drone formations were considered. The best formation was used for experiments with SwarmGear, and it showed low overall crosstrack error for the swarm (mean 7.9 cm for the type 1 gait and 5.1 cm for the type 2 gait). The proposed system can potentially improve the performance of autonomous swarms in cluttered and unstructured environments by allowing all agents of the swarm to switch between aerial and ground formations to overcome various obstacles and perform missions over a large area.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhanibek Darush, Mikhail Martynov, Aleksey Fedoseev, Aleksei Shcherbak, Dzmitry Tsetserukou. 2023-04-06. SwarmGear: Heterogeneous Swarm of Drones with Reconfigurable Leader Drone and Virtual Impedance Links for Multi-Robot Inspection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02956

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗