arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2303.17897

Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues

Gustavo Bergantinos·Juan D. Moreno-Ternero
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in these problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We study the relationship between all impartiality axioms. Besides we combine anonymity with other existing axioms in the literature. Some combinations give rise to new characterizations of well-known rules. The family of generalized split rules is characterized with anonymity, additivity and null team. The concede-and-divide rule is characterized with anonymity, additivity and essential team. Others combinations characterize new rules that had not been considered before. We provide three characterizations in which three axioms are the same (anonymity, additivity, and order preservation) the fourth one is different (maximum aspirations, weak upper bound, and non-negativity). Depending on the fourth axiom we obtain three different families of rules. In all of them concede-and-divide plays a central role.

Explore related subjects

econ.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gustavo Bergantinos, Juan D. Moreno-Ternero. 2023-03-31. Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

No Screening is More Efficient with Multiple Objects

We study the welfare-maximizing allocation of heterogeneous objects when screening uses costly effort rather than monetary transfers. No-screening mechanisms perform well as object variety increases. In a symmetric continuous market with i.i.d. values whose CDF is log-concave, the multidimensional problem reduces exactly to a single-dimensional problem in agents' best-option values. More options make low best-option values rarer, weakening the case for screening. We characterize when no screening is optimal and show it remains optimal as variety expands. Large-variety limits and numerical results for finite, correlated markets support this pattern. We apply these results to propose an invitation-based vaccine appointment system.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2026

Truthful Communication and Exclusive Information Clubs

This paper studies how strategic communication shapes endogenous communication networks. Agents form costly links, observe noisy private signals about a common state, exchange cheap-talk messages with neighbors, and choose actions that reward accuracy and coordination. We show that full revelation is sustainable if and only if every connected component is a clique. We then characterize the core of the endogenous network-formation game with heterogeneous signal precisions and weakly convex linking costs. Although every network admits non-informative continuation equilibria, every core outcome is truthful and consists of assortative exclusive information clubs generated by a recursive precision-cost maximization procedure. The characterization follows from an individual payoff bound that holds uniformly over all continuation strategy profiles. Core-stable clubs need not be efficient: assortative sorting can concentrate high-precision signals excessively, so a more mixed partition may yield higher aggregate welfare.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2026

Social Preferences and Cooperation: Beliefs, Robustness, and the Limits of Altruism

We study a mechanism of cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma (PD). Incorporating social preferences as efficiency concerns into the PD game, we study how altruism translates into cooperation. Under complete information, cooperation requires the opponent's altruism to clear a threshold. We then introduce a subjective extension of Bayesian Nash equilibrium that relaxes the Common Prior Assumption, letting players hold heterogeneous, potentially misspecified beliefs about each other's altruistic type. Cooperation then depends on beliefs about altruism rather than altruism itself, and can be sustained even when opponents are, on average, only weakly altruistic. When fear of exploitation dominates the temptation to defect, beliefs about the opponent's cooperation become strategic complements, so a cooperative and an uncooperative equilibrium can coexist under identical payoffs and an identical, correctly specified prior. Using multiplier preferences, we then study how robust this belief-driven cooperation is to model misspecification. Cooperation is fragile: it survives only above a threshold level of confidence in one's own belief, and can unravel even when the belief itself correctly supports cooperation. As a formal extension, the same robust-control apparatus, applied to a player's action choice, nests Nash equilibrium, Bayesian Nash equilibrium, and logit Quantal Response Equilibrium as limiting cases. Cooperation depends less on how altruistic agents are than on what they believe about each other, and how confident they are that this belief is right.

econ.TH↗