arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2303.12265

Autonomous Robotic Drilling System for Mice Cranial Window Creation: An Evaluation with an Egg Model

Enduo Zhao·Murilo M. Marinho·Kanako Harada
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Robotic assistance for experimental manipulation in the life sciences is expected to enable precise manipulation of valuable samples, regardless of the skill of the scientist. Experimental specimens in the life sciences are subject to individual variability and deformation, and therefore require autonomous robotic control. As an example, we are studying the installation of a cranial window in a mouse. This operation requires the removal of the skull, which is approximately 300 um thick, to cut it into a circular shape 8 mm in diameter, but the shape of the mouse skull varies depending on the strain of mouse, sex and week of age. The thickness of the skull is not uniform, with some areas being thin and others thicker. It is also difficult to ensure that the skulls of the mice are kept in the same position for each operation. It is not realistically possible to measure all these features and pre-program a robotic trajectory for individual mice. The paper therefore proposes an autonomous robotic drilling method. The proposed method consists of drilling trajectory planning and image-based task completion level recognition. The trajectory planning adjusts the z-position of the drill according to the task completion level at each discrete point, and forms the 3D drilling path via constrained cubic spline interpolation while avoiding overshoot. The task completion level recognition uses a DSSD-inspired deep learning model to estimate the task completion level of each discrete point. Since an egg has similar characteristics to a mouse skull in terms of shape, thickness and mechanical properties, removing the egg shell without damaging the membrane underneath was chosen as the simulation task. The proposed method was evaluated using a 6-DOF robotic arm holding a drill and achieved a success rate of 80% out of 20 trials.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Enduo Zhao, Murilo M. Marinho, Kanako Harada. 2023-03-22. Autonomous Robotic Drilling System for Mice Cranial Window Creation: An Evaluation with an Egg Model. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros55552.2023.10341693

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗