arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2303.09282

Data science and social justice in the mathematics community

Abstract

Data science for social justice (DS4SJ) is data-scientific work that supports the liberation of oppressed and marginalized people. By nature, this work lies at the intersection of technical scholarship and activist practice. We discuss this growing efforts in DS4SJ within the broad mathematics community. We begin by defining terms and offering a series of guiding principles for engaging in critical data science work, providing examples of how these principles play out in practice. We then highlight the roles that DS4SJ can play in the scholarship and pedagogy of practicing mathematicians. We focus in particular on the engagement of early-career mathematicians in DS4SJ, which we illustrate through a series of four personal vignettes. While the primary aim of DS4SJ is to achieve impact for marginalized communities, we also argue that engagement with DS4SJ can benefit the entire mathematical ecosystem, including researchers, instructors, students, departments, institutes, and professional societies. We close with reflections on how these various actors can support ongoing efforts in data science for social justice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Quindel Jones, Andrés R. Vindas Meléndez, Ariana Mendible, Manuchehr Aminian, Heather Z. Brooks, Nathan Alexander, Carrie Diaz Eaton, Philip Chodrow. 2023-03-14. Data science and social justice in the mathematics community. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09282

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO