arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2303.04535

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily rhythms

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted daily activity rhythms and life routines. Understanding the dynamics of these impacts on different groups of people is essential for creating environments where people's lives and well-being are least disturbed during such circumstances. Starting in June 2021, we conducted a year-long study to collect high-resolution data from fitness trackers as well as answers to monthly questionnaires from 128 working adults. Using questionnaires, we investigate how routines of exercising and working have changed throughout the pandemic for different people. In addition to that, for each person in the study, we build temporal distributions of daily step counts to quantify their daily movement rhythms and use the inverse of the Earth mover's distance between different movement rhythms to quantify the movement consistency over time. Throughout the pandemic, our cohort shows a shift in exercise routines, manifested in a decrease in time spent on non-walking physical exercises as opposed to the unchanged amount of time spent on walking. In terms of daily rhythms of movement, we show that migrants and those who live alone demonstrate a lower level of consistency of daily rhythms of movement compared to their counterparts. We also observe a relationship between movement and on-site work attendance, as participants who go to work (as opposed to working remotely) also tend to maintain more consistent daily rhythms of movement. Men and migrants show a faster pace in going back to work after the decrease in restriction measures that were set in place due to the pandemic. Our results quantitatively demonstrate the unequal effect of the pandemic among different sub-populations and inform organizations and policymakers to provide more adequate support and adapt to the different needs of different groups in the post-pandemic era.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nguyen Luong, Ian Barnett, Talayeh Aledavood. 2023-03-08. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily rhythms. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia%2Focad140

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are explainable AI (XAI) evaluation strategies aligned? Comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical evaluation measures using saliency maps

The evaluation of explainable AI (XAI) approaches often relies on three families of methods: subjective measures (e.g., questionnaires on trust or satisfaction), objective measures (e.g., task performance metrics), and mathematical metrics (e.g., for faithfulness). Yet, it remains unclear how these families align or diverge in practice. In a{preregistered} between-subjects study (N=166), we use three established saliency map techniques (LIME, Grad-CAM, Guided Backpropagation) as a testbed to examine this issue. We find that each family of methods leads to different conclusions: participants reported no differences in trust or satisfaction, Grad-CAM improved user performance, while mathematical metrics favored Guided Backpropagation. At the same time, mathematical metrics were only partially related to user performance, and these relationships were sometimes counterintuitive. Our findings highlight the methodological importance of comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical approaches when evaluating XAI, illustrating both tensions and aspects that are aligned. We discuss implications for XAI evaluation frameworks.

cs.HC

Mind Your Ps and Qs: Positive Moderation Practice in the Positive Queue

Online communities rely on volunteer moderators to maintain order. Despite their key role, moderators are given a toolbox of punishments and far less support for encouraging contributions they want to see more of. We introduce the Positive Queue as a positive counterpart to Reddit's modqueue: a dedicated space for moderators to discover contributions and behaviors they want to encourage and positively reinforce. With five moderators, four with 6-14 years of experience, we use the Positive Queue to examine how moderators operationalize positive reinforcement. Moderators combined predicted community reception, observed engagement, and their own judgment; used prediction-engagement mismatches to identify overlooked content; and repurposed positive features for punitive and retrospective work. These findings surface tensions around labor, attribution, and community fit. We contribute the Positive Queue as a working system and conceptualize positive moderation as recognition infrastructure that shapes what moderators notice, whose judgment becomes visible, and how recognition reaches contributors.

cs.HC

PILOT: Control Surfaces for Authoring Social Media Feeds

Personalized social media feeds infer preferences from behavior, leaving people little direct control over what they see. Existing controls range from post-level reactions to rules and natural language, but little is known about how people use them together or how added expressiveness changes effort. We built PILOT, a Bluesky feed-authoring system that turns in-feed actions into explicit preferences, deterministic ranking, and inspectable outcomes. A study with seven participants informed an expanded implementation, which we organized into three nested control surfaces that ten participants compared within subjects. Participants assigned controls to distinct jobs: broad controls set direction, in-post actions refined results, and filters removed content. Richer surfaces did not necessarily feel more effortful, and participants' experiences depended more on whether they could verify and repair outcomes. Our findings show that usable feed control requires not simply more controls, but orchestration across mechanisms that support expression, inspection, repair, and episodic use.

cs.HC