arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2303.02687

Expansion Lemma -- Variations and Applications to Polynomial-Time Preprocessing

Ashwin Jacob·Diptapriyo Majumdar·Venkatesh Raman
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In parameterized complexity, it is well-known that a parameterized problem is fixed-parameter tractable if and only if it has a kernel - an instance equivalent to the input instance, whose size is just a function of the parameter. The size of the kernel can be exponential or worse, resulting in a quest for fixed-parameter tractable problems with a polynomial-sized kernel. The developments in machinery to show lower bounds for the sizes of the kernel gave rise to the question of the asymptotically optimum size for the kernel of fixed-parameter tractable problems. In this article, we survey a tool called expansion lemma that helps in reducing the size of the kernel. Its early origin is in the form of Crown Decomposition for obtaining linear kernel for the Vertex Cover problem and the specific lemma was identified as the tool behind an optimal kernel with O(k^2) vertices and edges for the UNDIRECTED FEEDBACK VERTEX SET problem. Since then, several variations and extensions of the tool have been discovered. We survey them along with their applications in this article.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ashwin Jacob, Diptapriyo Majumdar, Venkatesh Raman. 2023-03-05. Expansion Lemma -- Variations and Applications to Polynomial-Time Preprocessing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.02687

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗