$k$-Center Clustering with Outliers in the MPC and Streaming Model

Mark de Berg; Leyla Biabani; Morteza Monemizadeh

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2302.12811

$k$-Center Clustering with Outliers in the MPC and Streaming Model

Mark de Berg·Leyla Biabani·Morteza Monemizadeh

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a point set $P \subseteq X$ of size $n$ in a metric space $(X,dist)$ of doubling dimension $d$ and two parameters $k \in N$ and $z \in N$, the $k$-center problem with $z$ outliers asks to return a set $C^\ast \subseteq X$ of $k$ centers such that the maximum distance of all but $z$ points of $P$ to their nearest center in $C^\ast$ is minimized. An $(\epsilon,k,z)$-coreset for this problem is a weighted point set $P^*$ such that an optimal solution for the $k$-center problem with $z$ outliers on $P^*$ gives a $(1\pm\epsilon)$-approximation for the $k$-center problem with $z$ outliers on $P$. We study the construction of such coresets in the Massively Parallel Computing (MPC) model, and in the insertion-only as well as the fully dynamic streaming model. We obtain the following results, for any given $0 < \epsilon \le 1$: In all cases, the size of the computed coreset is $O(k/\epsilon^d+z)$. - In the MPC model, we present a deterministic $2$-round and a randomized $1$-round algorithm. Additionally, we provide a deterministic algorithm that obtains a trade-off between the number of rounds, $R$, and the storage per machine. - For the insertion-only streaming model, we present an algorithm and a tight lower bound to support it. - We also discuss the dynamic streaming model, which allows both insertions and deletions in the data stream. In this model, we present the first algorithm and a lower bound. - Finally, we consider the sliding window model, where we are interested in maintaining an $(\epsilon,k,z)$-coreset for the last $W$ points in the stream, we present a tight lower bound that confirms the optimality of the previous work by De Berg, Monemizadeh, and Zhong (ESA2020).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.CG

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Mark de Berg, Leyla Biabani, Morteza Monemizadeh. 2023-02-24. $k$-Center Clustering with Outliers in the MPC and Streaming Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12811

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗