arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2301.04112

Spin glass phase at zero temperature in the Edwards-Anderson model

Sourav Chatterjee
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Mean field spin glass models have undergone substantial mathematical development, but finite dimensional short range spin glasses remain much less understood. This paper proves several rigorous zero temperature signatures of glassy behavior for the Edwards-Anderson model with Gaussian couplings, in finite boxes in arbitrary dimension. First, the ground state is sensitive to small perturbations of the disorder: after a perturbation of size $p$, the new ground state is nearly orthogonal to the original one in site overlap once $p$ is sufficiently larger than the inverse system size. Second, the droplets generated by such perturbations have large interfaces; in the macroscopic-droplet regime, their boundaries satisfy lower bounds consistent with a fractal dimension strictly greater than $d-1$. Third, there exist macroscopic spin excitations whose energy cost is negligible compared with the size of their interface, in sharp contrast with ferromagnetic behavior. Fourth, the expected size of the critical droplet associated with a typical bond grows at least as a power of the volume. Finally, a natural boundary condition sensitivity for nearest-neighbor spin products cannot decay faster than order the inverse distance to the boundary, contrasting with recent exponential decay results for the two-dimensional random field Ising model. Taken together, these results provide rigorous evidence -- and, in the senses made precise below, proof -- of zero temperature glassy behavior in a short range spin glass model.

Explore related subjects

math-phcond-mat.dis-nnmath.MPmath.PR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sourav Chatterjee. 2023-01-10. Spin glass phase at zero temperature in the Edwards-Anderson model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.04112

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗