arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2212.12341

A Cut-and-solve Algorithm for Virtual Machine Consolidation Problem

Abstract

The virtual machine consolidation problem (VMCP) attempts to determine which servers to be activated, how to allocate virtual machines (VMs) to the activated servers, and how to migrate VMs among servers such that the summation of activated, allocation, and migration costs is minimized subject to the resource constraints of the servers and other practical constraints. In this paper, we first propose a new mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulation for the VMCP. We show that compared with existing formulations, the proposed formulation is much more compact in terms of smaller numbers of variables or constraints, which makes it suitable for solving large-scale problems. We then develop a cut-and-solve (C&S) algorithm, a tree search algorithm to efficiently solve the VMCP to optimality. The proposed C&S algorithm is based on a novel relaxation of the VMCP that provides a stronger lower bound than the natural continuous relaxation of the VMCP, making a smaller search tree. By extensive computational experiments, we show that (i) the proposed formulation significantly outperforms existing formulations in terms of solution efficiency; and (ii) compared with standard MILP solvers, the proposed C&S algorithm is much more efficient.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jiang-Yao Luo, Liang Chen, Wei-Kun Chen, Jian-Hua Yuan, Yu-Hong Dai. 2022-12-23. A Cut-and-solve Algorithm for Virtual Machine Consolidation Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12341

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS