arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2212.11133

Device-Bind Key-Storageless Hardware AI Model IP Protection: A PUF and Permute-Diffusion Encryption-Enabled Approach

Qianqian Pan·Mianxiong Dong·Kaoru Ota·Jun Wu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Machine learning as a service (MLaaS) framework provides intelligent services or well-trained artificial intelligence (AI) models for local devices. However, in the process of model transmission and deployment, there are security issues, i.e. AI model leakage due to the unreliable transmission environments and illegal abuse at local devices without permission. Although existing works study the intellectual property (IP) protection of AI models, they mainly focus on the watermark-based and encryption-based methods and have the following problems: (i) The watermark-based methods only provide passive verification afterward rather than active protection. (ii) Encryption-based methods are low efficiency in computation and low security in key storage. (iii) The existing methods are not device-bind without the ability to avoid illegal abuse of AI models. To deal with these problems, we propose a device-bind and key-storageless hardware AI model IP protection mechanism. First, a physical unclonable function (PUF) and permute-diffusion encryption-based AI model protection framework is proposed, including the PUF-based secret key generation and the geometric-value transformation-based weights encryption. Second, we design a PUF-based key generation protocol, where delay-based Anderson PUF is adopted to generate the derive-bind secret key. Besides, convolutional coding and convolutional interleaving technologies are combined to improve the stability of PUF-based key generation and reconstruction. Third, a permute and diffusion-based intelligent model weights encryption/decryption method is proposed to achieve effective IP protection, where chaos theory is utilized to convert the PUF-based secret key to encryption/decryption keys. Finally, experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed intelligent model IP protection mechanism.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Qianqian Pan, Mianxiong Dong, Kaoru Ota, Jun Wu. 2022-12-21. Device-Bind Key-Storageless Hardware AI Model IP Protection: A PUF and Permute-Diffusion Encryption-Enabled Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.11133

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗