arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2212.07490

Performance Enhancement Strategies for Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiplication (SpMV) and Iterative Linear Solvers

Abstract

Iterative solutions of sparse linear systems and sparse eigenvalue problems have a fundamental role in vital fields of scientific research and engineering. The crucial computing kernel for such iterative solutions is the multiplication of a sparse matrix by a dense vector. Efficient implementation of sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMV) and linear solvers are therefore essential and has been subjected to extensive research across a variety of computing architectures and accelerators such as central processing units (CPUs), graphical processing units (GPUs), many integrated cores (MICs), and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Unleashing the full potential of an architecture/accelerator requires determining the factors that affect an efficient implementation of SpMV. This article presents the first of its kind, in-depth survey covering over two hundred state-of-the-art optimization schemes for solving sparse iterative linear systems with a focus on computing SpMV. A new taxonomy for iterative solutions and SpMV techniques common to all architectures is proposed. This article includes reviews of SpMV techniques for all architectures to consolidate a single taxonomy to encourage cross-architectural and heterogeneous-architecture developments. However, the primary focus is on GPUs. The major contributions as well as the primary, secondary, and tertiary contributions of the SpMV techniques are first highlighted utilizing the taxonomy and then qualitatively compared. A summary of the current state of the research for each architecture is discussed separately. Finally, several open problems and key challenges for future research directions are outlined.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Thaha Mohammed, Rashid Mehmood. 2022-12-14. Performance Enhancement Strategies for Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiplication (SpMV) and Iterative Linear Solvers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07490

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS