arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2212.03147

Effects of Racial Segregation on Economic Productivity in U.S. Cities

Andrew J. Stier·Sina Sajjadi·Luıs M. A. Bettencourt·Fariba Karimi·Marc G. Berman
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Homophily and heterophobia, the tendency for people with similar characteristics to preferentially interact with (or avoid) each other are pervasive in human social networks. Here, we develop an extension of the mathematical theory of urban scaling which describes the effects of homophily and heterophobia on social interactions and resulting economic outputs of cities. Empirical tests of our model show that increased residential racial heterophobia and segregation in U.S. cities are associated with reduced economic outputs and that the strength of this relationship increased throughout the 2010s. Our findings provide the means for the formal incorporation of general homophilic and heterophobic effects into theories of modern urban science and suggest that racial segregation is increasingly and adversely impacting the economic performance and connectivity of urban societies in the U.S.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrew J. Stier, Sina Sajjadi, Luıs M. A. Bettencourt, Fariba Karimi, Marc G. Berman. 2022-12-06. Effects of Racial Segregation on Economic Productivity in U.S. Cities. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.03147

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Competition drives excessive recruitment in collective search

Groups that search collectively often exploit what they find by recruiting: one member directs others to a site it has found. Recruitment raises the number of members foraging at a known site, but the return per forager may fall as that number grows, so there is an intermediate optimal recruitment rate. In addition, a site may be used by more than one group. Here we analyze a model of two groups that forage from a single site whose return declines with the total number of foragers present. The two groups interact only through this shared return. The long-run outcome is either coexistence at the foraging site or monopoly by one group, and we analyze the boundary between these two outcomes. A group's best response to its rival is not monotone: it increases its own recruitment rate with the rival's recruitment rate in an attempt to preserve a monopoly, and then its recruitment rate drops discontinuously when it is no longer optimal to preserve a monopoly. We analyze how model parameters govern this shift: a group relinquishes monopoly when the site saturates at few foragers and when the rival group is small. When the two groups have comparable size there are multiple Nash equilibria, so either group may end up with the larger share. And when two equally matched groups compete, both recruit above the rate that maximizes their common return, so that each individual ends with less than it would in a single undivided group of the same total size.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Generation time in a discrete epidemic model with asymptomatic carriers: beyond geometric waiting times

We study the random times between successive cases in a transmission chain of infectious diseases with asymptomatic carriers. We derive the probability distribution of this generation time (in days) from a discrete-time epidemic model with variable infectiousness both along elapsed times and across phases. The introduced non-Markovian model is a compact recursive system featuring random waiting times at each of the three infected stages: latent, asymptomatic, and symptomatic. By rearranging the terms of the basic reproduction number, which represents the expected number of secondary cases produced by an asymptomatic primary case who may eventually develop symptoms, we get to the generation-time probabilities. The expected generation time is a convex combination of the expected generation times before and after the onset of symptoms. Additionally, our analysis reveals that the n-th moment of the generation time is related to the moments up to n-th order of the weighted forward recurrence time at each phase and the moments up to n-th order of the latent period and the incubation period. These weights are the infectiousness along the elapsed times for each transmission phase. Finally, we illustrate several data-driven epidemic scenarios, assuming that infectiousness varies only across phases and discrete Weibull distributions for the waiting times. Each disease analyzed shows a range of variability in its generation time distribution, from low to moderate.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Regularizing and Normalizing DAGs and Phylogenetic Networks

Phylogenetic networks and, more generally, directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) represent hierarchical structure beyond trees, for instance in the presence of reticulate evolutionary events such as hybridization or horizontal gene transfer. A central question is which parts of such graphs are essential with respect to leaf-observable information, and which parts can be removed without changing this information. Resolving this question can lead to principled simplification methods for phylogenetic networks, such as the recent normalization approach of Francis et al. In this paper, we study this question from three related perspectives: clusters displayed by a DAG $G$, least common ancestors (LCAs) of subsets of its leaf set, and visibility, a path-based property of vertices. We first introduce an LCA-based simplification procedure called $i$-regularization. For a DAG $G$ and $i\geq 1$, the DAG $\reg_i(G)$ retains precisely those vertices that occur as unique LCAs of leaf subsets of size at most $i$, removes the remaining non-leaf vertices by a graph-editing operation $\ominus$, and then deletes shortcuts. We show that $\reg_i(G)$ admits a Hasse-diagram characterization in terms of the corresponding lca-clusters. We then compare LCA-based regularization with normalization. Using the same $\ominus$-operator, we describe the cover construction underlying normalization, identify visible vertices that are nevertheless removed, and characterize when regularization and normalization coincide. Together, these results provide a unified framework for cluster-based, LCA-based, and visibility-based simplifications of DAGs and phylogenetic networks.

q-bio.PE↗