arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2211.12451

Fault-Tolerant Dispersion of Mobile Robots

Prabhat Kumar Chand·Manish Kumar·Anisur Rahaman Molla·Sumathi Sivasubramaniam
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the mobile robot dispersion problem in the presence of faulty robots (crash-fault). Mobile robot dispersion consists of $k\leq n$ robots in an $n$-node anonymous graph. The goal is to ensure that regardless of the initial placement of the robots over the nodes, the final configuration consists of having at most one robot at each node. In a crash-fault setting, up to $f \leq k$ robots may fail by crashing arbitrarily and subsequently lose all the information stored at the robots, rendering them unable to communicate. In this paper, we solve the dispersion problem in a crash-fault setting by considering two different initial configurations: i) the rooted configuration, and ii) the arbitrary configuration. In the rooted case, all robots are placed together at a single node at the start. The arbitrary configuration is a general configuration (a.k.a. arbitrary configuration in the literature) where the robots are placed in some $l<k$ clusters arbitrarily across the graph. For the first case, we develop an algorithm solving dispersion in the presence of faulty robots in $O(k^2)$ rounds, which improves over the previous $O(f\cdot\text{min}(m,kΔ))$-round result by \cite{PS021}. For the arbitrary configuration, we present an algorithm solving dispersion in $O((f+l)\cdot\text{min}(m, k Δ, k^2))$ rounds, when the number of edges $m$ and the maximum degree $Δ$ of the graph is known to the robots.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Prabhat Kumar Chand, Manish Kumar, Anisur Rahaman Molla, Sumathi Sivasubramaniam. 2022-11-22. Fault-Tolerant Dispersion of Mobile Robots. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12451

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Concertina: Data-Centric Adaptive Pipeline Parallelism for Efficient Heterogeneous Long-Context LLM Training

Long context training is crucial for extending LLM context windows. Existing schemes, such as sequence parallelism, incur substantial communication overhead. Pipeline parallelism (PP) reduces this cost, but its effectiveness hinges on partitioning granularity. Batch-level PP employing sequence packing exhibits high memory consumption in long-context scenarios, whereas token-level PP splitting sequences into slices alleviates memory overhead but may introduce performance degradation. Moreover, the skewed sequence-length distribution in real-world datasets defeats any monolithic, static choice of PP granularity. In this paper, we propose \textit{Dynamic Pipeline Parallelism} (DPP), which transforms PP granularity from a static design choice into a workload-adaptive optimization space over packed, split, and hybrid chunks. DPP further introduces a new coupling between heterogeneous pipeline scheduling and gradient checkpointing. To solve this coupling, \name co-optimizes dynamic chunk scheduling with \textit{Stage-Aware Chunk-Level Adaptive Checkpointing}. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that \name achieves up to 1.69\texttimes\ speedup over FlexSP and up to 1.40\texttimes\ over MEPipe. The source code is available at https://github.com/wsjdsg/InfiniPipe-code.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

A Low-Latency Semantic State Estimator using Latent Predictive Learning for Dynamic Network Monitoring and Orchestration

Closed-loop network monitoring and orchestration increasingly require semantic interpretations of live telemetry beyond raw counter collection. However, dynamic cloud-edge environments change both the active node set and the monitoring query at runtime, while control loops demand bounded millisecond-scale responses. We introduce a latent predictive state estimator (LPSE) for dynamic network monitoring and orchestration, built on latent predictive learning over streaming telemetry. The framework converts variable-cardinality node telemetry into topology-adaptive temporal representations, fuses them with monitoring questions, and returns bounded answers from a semantic codebook instead of autoregressive text generation. This design enables fixed-cost, single-pass inference while preserving semantic interpretability. By operating on permutation-invariant, slot-routed node representations keyed by stable identity, the model maintains a fixed input space and generalizes to node addition, removal, and reordering without retraining. Experimental results on a multi-node Kubernetes cluster show semantic prediction accuracy of 87.13% at approximately 72x lower mean inference latency compared to the lowest latency LLM tested.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

X-Stage: Modeling Post-Issue Backpressure in GPU Communication--Computation Fusion

Fine-grained, device-initiated communication allows fused GPU kernels to issue remote stores directly from their compute pipelines, a pattern increasingly used in expert parallelism (EP), tensor parallelism (TP), and Ulysses-style sequence parallelism (UP). Existing designs reason about where communication is issued and when remote data becomes ready, but lack a quantitative model of the sender-side interval after a remote store is accepted and before it becomes visible at the destination. This interval determines whether communication remains decoupled from computation or backpressures it. We identify X-Stage, a software-visible post-issue stage with finite decoupling. Downstream pressure can dissipate while the issuer resumes useful work, whereas sustained injection consumes X-Stage headroom and eventually stalls the compute pipeline. We characterize this behavior and build a calibrated model that predicts whether remote-store arrivals accumulate backpressure or recover during intervening computation. Guided by the model, we reshape bursty arrivals when they would exhaust X-Stage headroom and exploit natural compute windows when headroom can recover concurrently. Evaluation across representative EP, TP, and UP workloads shows up to 1.62x fused-kernel, 1.75x end-to-end, and 1.43x sender-visible speedup, respectively. Microbenchmarks further validate the model's predictions of backlog accumulation, recovery, and sender-side backpressure.

cs.DC↗