arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2211.12061

Financing Urban Infrastructure through Land Leasing: Evidence from Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia

Abstract

The provision of essential urban infrastructure and services for the expanding population is a persistent financial challenge for many of the rapidly expanding cities in developing nations like Ethiopia. The land lease system has received little academic attention as a means of financing urban infrastructure in developing countries. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to assess the contribution of land leasing in financing urban infrastructure and services using evidence from Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia. Primary and secondary data-gathering techniques have been used. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis have been adopted. The results show land lease revenue is a dominant source of extra-budgetary revenue for Bahir Dar city. As evidenced by Bahir Dar city, a significant portion of urban infrastructure expenditure is financed by revenues from land leasing. However, despite the critical importance of land lease revenue to investments in urban infrastructure, there is inefficiency in the collection of potential lease revenue due to weak information exchange, inadequate land provision for various uses, lack of transparency in tender committees, and the existence of poor documentation. Our findings suggest that Bahir Dar City needs to manage lease revenue more effectively to increase investment in urban infrastructure while giving due consideration to availing more land for leasing. Keywords: urban, land, revenue, inefficiency, lease, financing, Bahir Dar City

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wudu Muluneh, Tadesse Amsalu. 2022-11-25. Financing Urban Infrastructure through Land Leasing: Evidence from Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12061

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN