arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2211.07928

False: False Negative Samples Aware Contrastive Learning for Semantic Segmentation of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Image

Zhaoyang Zhang·Xuying Wang·Xiaoming Mei·Chao Tao·Haifeng Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The existing SSCL of RSI is built based on constructing positive and negative sample pairs. However, due to the richness of RSI ground objects and the complexity of the RSI contextual semantics, the same RSI patches have the coexistence and imbalance of positive and negative samples, which causing the SSCL pushing negative samples far away while pushing positive samples far away, and vice versa. We call this the sample confounding issue (SCI). To solve this problem, we propose a False negAtive sampLes aware contraStive lEarning model (FALSE) for the semantic segmentation of high-resolution RSIs. Since the SSCL pretraining is unsupervised, the lack of definable criteria for false negative sample (FNS) leads to theoretical undecidability, we designed two steps to implement the FNS approximation determination: coarse determination of FNS and precise calibration of FNS. We achieve coarse determination of FNS by the FNS self-determination (FNSD) strategy and achieve calibration of FNS by the FNS confidence calibration (FNCC) loss function. Experimental results on three RSI semantic segmentation datasets demonstrated that the FALSE effectively improves the accuracy of the downstream RSI semantic segmentation task compared with the current three models, which represent three different types of SSCL models. The mean Intersection-over-Union on ISPRS Potsdam dataset is improved by 0.7\% on average; on CVPR DGLC dataset is improved by 12.28\% on average; and on Xiangtan dataset this is improved by 1.17\% on average. This indicates that the SSCL model has the ability to self-differentiate FNS and that the FALSE effectively mitigates the SCI in self-supervised contrastive learning. The source code is available at https://github.com/GeoX-Lab/FALSE.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhaoyang Zhang, Xuying Wang, Xiaoming Mei, Chao Tao, Haifeng Li. 2022-11-15. False: False Negative Samples Aware Contrastive Learning for Semantic Segmentation of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Image. https://doi.org/10.1109/lgrs.2022.3222836

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗