arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2211.06447

Modern Definition and Ancient Definition

Clarence Protin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this essay we examine some aspects of the classical theory of definition as codified in Aristotle's \emph{Topics} and Porphyry's \emph{Eisagog\^e} in the light of the way definition is carried out in modern mathematical practice. Our goal is to contribute to the understanding of the alleged gap existing between ancient and modern logic and science as well as the reasons behind allegations of inadequacy and lack of sophistication in the ancient theory of definition. Also to investigate the possibility of a co-interpretation between modern mathematical definitional practice and ancient definitional practice in particular in the light of topos theory. We find the ancient definitional practice asks relevant and overlooked questions about modern mathematical practice which apparently have escaped current philosophical and mathematical logical literature. We also present some general considerations about the structure and development of theories as these relate to the theory of definition.

Explore related subjects

math.HOmath.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Clarence Protin. 2022-11-11. Modern Definition and Ancient Definition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06447

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗