arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2211.01468

A New Approach to Estimating Effective Resistances and Counting Spanning Trees in Expander Graphs

Abstract

We demonstrate that for expander graphs, for all $\epsilon > 0,$ there exists a data structure of size $\widetilde{O}(n\epsilon^{-1})$ which can be used to return $(1 + \epsilon)$-approximations to effective resistances in $\widetilde{O}(1)$ time per query. Short of storing all effective resistances, previous best approaches could achieve $\widetilde{O}(n\epsilon^{-2})$ size and $\widetilde{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ time per query by storing Johnson-Lindenstrauss vectors for each vertex, or $\widetilde{O}(n\epsilon^{-1})$ size and $\widetilde{O}(n\epsilon^{-1})$ time per query by storing a spectral sketch. Our construction is based on two key ideas: 1) $\epsilon^{-1}$-sparse, $\epsilon$-additive approximations to $DL^+1_u$ for all $u,$ can be used to recover $(1 + \epsilon)$-approximations to the effective resistances, 2) In expander graphs, only $\widetilde{O}(\epsilon^{-1})$ coordinates of a vector similar to $DL^+1_u$ are larger than $\epsilon.$ We give an efficient construction for such a data structure in $\widetilde{O}(m + n\epsilon^{-2})$ time via random walks. This results in an algorithm for computing $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate effective resistances for $s$ vertex pairs in expanders that runs in $\widetilde{O}(m + n\epsilon^{-2} + s)$ time, improving over the previously best known running time of $m^{1 + o(1)} + (n + s)n^{o(1)}\epsilon^{-1.5}$ for $s = \omega(n\epsilon^{-0.5}).$ We employ the above algorithm to compute a $(1+\delta)$-approximation to the number of spanning trees in an expander graph, or equivalently, approximating the (pseudo)determinant of its Laplacian in $\widetilde{O}(m + n^{1.5}\delta^{-1})$ time. This improves on the previously best known result of $m^{1+o(1)} + n^{1.875+o(1)}\delta^{-1.75}$ time, and matches the best known size of determinant sparsifiers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lawrence Li, Sushant Sachdeva. 2022-11-02. A New Approach to Estimating Effective Resistances and Counting Spanning Trees in Expander Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01468

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS