arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2211.01429

Fast Bayesian estimation of brain activation with cortical surface fMRI data using EM

Abstract

Task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a type of neuroimaging data used to identify areas of the brain that activate during specific tasks or stimuli. These data are conventionally modeled using a massive univariate approach across all data locations, which ignores spatial dependence at the cost of model power. We previously developed and validated a spatial Bayesian model leveraging dependencies along the cortical surface of the brain in order to improve accuracy and power. This model utilizes stochastic partial differential equation spatial priors with sparse precision matrices to allow for appropriate modeling of spatially-dependent activations seen in the neuroimaging literature, resulting in substantial increases in model power. Our original implementation relies on the computational efficiencies of the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) to overcome the computational challenges of analyzing high-dimensional fMRI data while avoiding issues associated with variational Bayes implementations. However, this requires significant memory resources, extra software, and software licenses to run. In this article, we develop an exact Bayesian analysis method for the general linear model, employing an efficient expectation-maximization algorithm to find maximum a posteriori estimates of task-based regressors on cortical surface fMRI data. Through an extensive simulation study of cortical surface-based fMRI data, we compare our proposed method to the existing INLA implementation, as well as a conventional massive univariate approach employing ad-hoc spatial smoothing. We also apply the method to task fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project and show that our proposed implementation produces similar results to the validated INLA implementation. Both the INLA and EM-based implementations are available through our open-source BayesfMRI R package.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daniel A. Spencer, David Bolin, Amanda F. Mejia. 2022-11-02. Fast Bayesian estimation of brain activation with cortical surface fMRI data using EM. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01429

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME