kafe2 -- a Modern Tool for Model Fitting in Physics Lab Courses

Johannes Gäßler; Günter Quast; Daniel Savoiu; Cedric Verstege

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2210.12768

kafe2 -- a Modern Tool for Model Fitting in Physics Lab Courses

Johannes Gäßler·Günter Quast·Daniel Savoiu·Cedric Verstege

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Fitting models to measured data is one of the standard tasks in the natural sciences, typically addressed early on in physics education in the context of laboratory courses, in which statistical methods play a central role in analysing and interpreting experimental results. The increased emphasis placed on such methods in modern school curricula, together with the availability of powerful free and open-source software tools geared towards scientific data analysis, form an excellent premise for the development of new teaching concepts for these methods at the university level. In this article, we present kafe2, a new tool developed at the Faculty of Physics at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, which has been used in physics laboratory courses for several years. Written in the {\it Python} programming language and making extensive use of established numerical and optimization libraries, {\it kafe2} provides simple but powerful interfaces for numerically fitting model functions to data. The tools provided allow for fine-grained control over many aspects of the fitting procedure, including the specification of the input data and of arbitrarily complex model functions, the construction of complex uncertainty models, and the visualization of the resulting confidence intervals of the model parameters.

Explore related subjects

physics.ed-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Johannes Gäßler, Günter Quast, Daniel Savoiu, Cedric Verstege. 2022-10-23. kafe2 -- a Modern Tool for Model Fitting in Physics Lab Courses. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12768

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Data-driven modeling in the introductory physics laboratory: Scaling analysis and data collapse in the specific heat of water experiment

In introductory physics laboratories, a central instructional goal is to help students construct and evaluate mathematical models from empirical data rather than applying given formulas. We present a data-driven redesign of the classic specific heat of water experiment that emphasizes scaling analysis and data collapse as tools for model construction. The activity combines structured experimental and analytical guidance with instructor-mediated questioning, while thermodynamic theory is deliberately postponed. Students collect temperature-time data under various experimental conditions, producing multiple data sets that initially appear unrelated. Through successive rescaling, students reduce the dimensionality of the variable space and achieve data collapse onto a single master curve, from which they formulate an empirical model relating energy input, mass, and temperature change. The analysis highlights a limitation of multiplicative scaling: the additive contribution of the calorimeter cannot be eliminated, leading to a structural non-identifiability of the subsystem contributions. To clarify the domain of validity of the model, a thermodynamic description is introduced a posteriori as a boundary-setting framework for interpreting the empirical model. In this sense, the central contribution of this work is to use data-driven modeling both to construct models and to reveal their intrinsic limitations. The experiment provides an accessible example of how scaling, data collapse, and theoretical reasoning can be integrated in an introductory laboratory.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

Missing Data on Physics Exams: Demographic Patterns, Course-Level Predictions, and Implications for Equity

In a previous quantitative retrospective study we showed that different demographic groups of students leave different numbers of problems blank on physics exams, leading to inequities in course outcomes. In that work we argued that there were good reasons to treat these blanks as missing data, rather than indicators of a lack of understanding. In this paper, we refine this analysis and show more detailed breakdowns of uncollected test item responses by race/ethnicity and first generation college student status, coming to the same conclusion: test item responses are uncollected for students with different ethnic and racial backgrounds at different rates, and these patterns are not exclusive to low-performing students. We also correct an error from our previous work, finding here that there is no significant gender difference in uncollected test item responses. Finally, we provide a more robust analysis of course level data illustrating that blanks are a variable controlled at the course level rather than the student level, providing more evidence for the use of a course deficit model (rather than a student deficit model) when examining equity disparities, and also suggesting that there are plausible means for instructors to minimize uncollected test item responses, and therefore reduce or even eliminate the bias associated with this missing data. We provide a couple suggestions for faculty who want to minimize the impacts of blanks.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

A Framework for Characterizing Learning Contributions Across the Initial Achievement Spectrum

Conceptual assessments are widely used in physics education research to evaluate changes in student understanding, yet class average measures can obscure how those changes are distributed across students with different levels of initial achievement. We introduce a Learning Contribution Framework that characterizes this distribution through the Learning Contribution Curve (LCC) and Learning Contribution Profile (LCP). For a general contribution measure G, the LCC represents cumulative contribution across students ranked by initial achievement, whereas the LCP describes the local mean contribution relative to the population mean of the individual G values. We apply the framework to the individual Hake normalized gain and develop a statistical model linking LCC and LCP behavior to the joint structure of pretest and posttest scores. Under the central assumption that the conditional mean of the subsequent score is linear in the initial score, we identify a score structure parameter $β$ and a critical score structure parameter $β_c$. Whether $β$ is greater than, less than, or equal to $β_c$ determines whether the expected LCP increases, decreases, or remains constant across initial achievement. Given the pretest distribution, the model further yields analytical predictions for the complete LCP and LCC that closely reproduce simulation results. Application to classroom concept-assessment data illustrates how the framework reveals local and cumulative patterns of learning contribution that are not evident from an overall class average revealed by the traditional Hake's normalized gain.

physics.ed-ph↗