arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2210.12601

Sublinear-Time Algorithms for Max Cut, Max E2Lin$(q)$, and Unique Label Cover on Expanders

Pan Peng·Yuichi Yoshida
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We show sublinear-time algorithms for Max Cut and Max E2Lin$(q)$ on expanders in the adjacency list model that distinguishes instances with the optimal value more than $1-\varepsilon$ from those with the optimal value less than $1-ρ$ for $ρ\gg \varepsilon$. The time complexities for Max Cut and Max $2$Lin$(q)$ are $\widetilde{O}(\frac{1}{ϕ^2ρ} \cdot m^{1/2+O(\varepsilon/(ϕ^2ρ))})$ and $\widetilde{O}(\mathrm{poly}(\frac{q}{ϕρ})\cdot {(mq)}^{1/2+O(q^6\varepsilon/ϕ^2ρ^2)})$, respectively, where $m$ is the number of edges in the underlying graph and $ϕ$ is its conductance. Then, we show a sublinear-time algorithm for Unique Label Cover on expanders with $ϕ\gg ε$ in the bounded-degree model. The time complexity of our algorithm is $\widetilde{O}_d(2^{q^{O(1)}\cdotϕ^{1/q}\cdot \varepsilon^{-1/2}}\cdot n^{1/2+q^{O(q)}\cdot \varepsilon^{4^{1.5-q}}\cdot ϕ^{-2}})$, where $n$ is the number of variables. We complement these algorithmic results by showing that testing $3$-colorability requires $Ω(n)$ queries even on expanders.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pan Peng, Yuichi Yoshida. 2022-10-23. Sublinear-Time Algorithms for Max Cut, Max E2Lin$(q)$, and Unique Label Cover on Expanders. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12601

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗