arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2210.07911

Popularity on the Roommate Diversity Problem

Steven Ge·Toshiya Itoh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A recently introduced restricted variant of the multidimensional stable roommate problem is the roommate diversity problem: each agent belongs to one of two types (e.g., red and blue), and the agents' preferences over the coalitions solely depend on the fraction of agents of their own type among their roommates. There are various notions of stability that defines an optimal partitioning of agents. The notion of popularity has received a lot of attention recently. A partitioning of agents is popular if there does not exist another partitioning in which more agents are better off than worse off. Computing a popular partition in a stable roommate game can be done in polynomial time. When we allow ties the stable roommate problem becomes NP-complete. Determining the existence of a popular solution in the multidimensional stable roommate problem also NP-hard. We show that in the roommate diversity problem with the room size fixed to two, the problem becomes tractable. Particularly, a popular partitioning of agents is guaranteed to exist and can be computed in polynomial time. Additionally a mixed popular partitioning of agents is always guaranteed to exist in any roommate diversity game. By contrast, when there are no restrictions on the coalition size of a roommate diversity game, a popular partitioning may fail to exist and the problem becomes intractable. Our results intractability results are summarized as follows: * Determining the existence of a popular partitioning is co-NP-hard, even if the agents' preferences are trichotomous. * Determining the existence of a strictly popular partitioning is co-NP-hard, even if the agents' preferences are dichotomous. * Computing a mixed popular partitioning of agents in polynomial time is impossible unless P=NP, even if the agents' preferences are dichotomous.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.CCcs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Steven Ge, Toshiya Itoh. 2022-10-14. Popularity on the Roommate Diversity Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07911

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗