DroneARchery: Human-Drone Interaction through Augmented Reality with Haptic Feedback and Multi-UAV Collision Avoidance Driven by Deep Reinforcement Learning

Ekaterina Dorzhieva; Ahmed Baza; Ayush Gupta; Aleksey Fedoseev; Miguel Altamirano Cabrera; Ekaterina Karmanova; Dzmitry Tsetserukou

arXiv · 2210.07730

DroneARchery: Human-Drone Interaction through Augmented Reality with Haptic Feedback and Multi-UAV Collision Avoidance Driven by Deep Reinforcement Learning

Ekaterina Dorzhieva·Ahmed Baza·Ayush Gupta·Aleksey Fedoseev·Miguel Altamirano Cabrera·Ekaterina Karmanova·Dzmitry Tsetserukou

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We propose a novel concept of augmented reality (AR) human-drone interaction driven by RL-based swarm behavior to achieve intuitive and immersive control of a swarm formation of unmanned aerial vehicles. The DroneARchery system developed by us allows the user to quickly deploy a swarm of drones, generating flight paths simulating archery. The haptic interface LinkGlide delivers a tactile stimulus of the bowstring tension to the forearm to increase the precision of aiming. The swarm of released drones dynamically avoids collisions between each other, the drone following the user, and external obstacles with behavior control based on deep reinforcement learning. The developed concept was tested in the scenario with a human, where the user shoots from a virtual bow with a real drone to hit the target. The human operator observes the ballistic trajectory of the drone in an AR and achieves a realistic and highly recognizable experience of the bowstring tension through the haptic display. The experimental results revealed that the system improves trajectory prediction accuracy by 63.3% through applying AR technology and conveying haptic feedback of pulling force. DroneARchery users highlighted the naturalness (4.3 out of 5 point Likert scale) and increased confidence (4.7 out of 5) when controlling the drone. We have designed the tactile patterns to present four sliding distances (tension) and three applied force levels (stiffness) of the haptic display. Users demonstrated the ability to distinguish tactile patterns produced by the haptic display representing varying bowstring tension(average recognition rate is of 72.8%) and stiffness (average recognition rate is of 94.2%). The novelty of the research is the development of an AR-based approach for drone control that does not require special skills and training from the operator.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO cs.HC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Ekaterina Dorzhieva, Ahmed Baza, Ayush Gupta, Aleksey Fedoseev, Miguel Altamirano Cabrera, Ekaterina Karmanova, Dzmitry Tsetserukou. 2022-10-14. DroneARchery: Human-Drone Interaction through Augmented Reality with Haptic Feedback and Multi-UAV Collision Avoidance Driven by Deep Reinforcement Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07730

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗