A Constructive Prophet Inequality Approach to The Adaptive ProbeMax Problem

Guillermo Gallego; Danny Segev

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2210.07556

A Constructive Prophet Inequality Approach to The Adaptive ProbeMax Problem

Guillermo Gallego·Danny Segev

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the adaptive ProbeMax problem, given a collection of mutually-independent random variables $X_1, \ldots, X_n$, our goal is to design an adaptive probing policy for sequentially sampling at most $k$ of these variables, with the objective of maximizing the expected maximum value sampled. In spite of its stylized formulation, this setting captures numerous technical hurdles inherent to stochastic optimization, related to both information structure and efficient computation. For these reasons, adaptive ProbeMax has served as a test bed for a multitude of algorithmic methods, and concurrently as a popular teaching tool in courses and tutorials dedicated to recent trends in optimization under uncertainty. The main contribution of this paper consists in proposing a novel method for upper-bounding the expected maximum reward of optimal adaptive probing policies, based on a simple min-max problem. Equipped with this method, we devise purely-combinatorial algorithms for deterministically computing feasible sets whose vicinity to the adaptive optimum is analyzed through prophet inequality ideas. Consequently, this approach allows us to establish improved constructive adaptivity gaps for the ProbeMax problem in its broadest form, where $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are general random variables, making further advancements when $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are continuous.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Guillermo Gallego, Danny Segev. 2022-10-14. A Constructive Prophet Inequality Approach to The Adaptive ProbeMax Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07556

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗