arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2210.07534

Time-Space Tradeoffs for Element Distinctness and Set Intersection via Pseudorandomness

Xin Lyu·Weihao Zhu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the Element Distinctness problem, one is given an array $a_1,\dots, a_n$ of integers from $[poly(n)]$ and is tasked to decide if $\{a_i\}$ are mutually distinct. Beame, Clifford and Machmouchi (FOCS 2013) gave a low-space algorithm for this problem running in space $S(n)$ and time $T(n)$ where $T(n) \le \widetilde{O}(n^{3/2}/S(n)^{1/2})$, assuming a random oracle (i.e., random access to polynomially many random bits). A recent breakthrough by Chen, Jin, Williams and Wu (SODA 2022) showed how to remove the random oracle assumption in the regime $S(n) = polylog(n)$ and $T(n) = \widetilde{O}(n^{3/2})$. They designed the first truly $polylog(n)$-space, $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2})$-time algorithm by constructing a small family of hash functions $\mathcal{H} \subseteq \{h | h:[poly(n)]\to [n]\}$ with a certain pseudorandom property. In this paper, we give a significantly simplified analysis of the pseudorandom hash family by Chen et al. Our analysis clearly identifies the key pseudorandom property required to fool the BCM algorithm, allowing us to explore the full potential of this construction. As our main result, we show a time-space tradeoff for Element Distinctness without random oracle. Namely, for every $S(n),T(n)$ such that $T\approx \widetilde{O}(n^{3/2}/S(n)^{1/2})$, our algorithm can solve the problem in space $S(n)$ and time $T(n)$. Our algorithm also works for a related problem Set Intersection, for which this tradeoff is tight due to a matching lower bound by Dinur (Eurocrypt 2020). As two additional contributions, we show a more general pseudorandom property of the hash family, and slightly improve the seed length to sample the pseudorandom hash function.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xin Lyu, Weihao Zhu. 2022-10-14. Time-Space Tradeoffs for Element Distinctness and Set Intersection via Pseudorandomness. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07534

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗