arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2208.14152

Value-at-Risk constrained portfolios in incomplete markets: a dynamic programming approach to Heston's model

Marcos Escobar-Anel·Yevhen Havrylenko·Rudi Zagst
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We solve an expected utility-maximization problem with a Value-at-risk constraint on the terminal portfolio value in an incomplete financial market due to stochastic volatility. To derive the optimal investment strategy, we use the dynamic programming approach. We demonstrate that the value function in the constrained problem can be represented as the expected modified utility function of a vega-neutral financial derivative on the optimal terminal wealth in the unconstrained utility-maximization problem. Via the same financial derivative, the optimal wealth and the optimal investment strategy in the constrained problem are linked to the optimal wealth and the optimal investment strategy in the unconstrained problem. In numerical studies, we substantiate the impact of risk aversion levels and investment horizons on the optimal investment strategy. We observe a 20% relative difference between the constrained and unconstrained allocations for average parameters in a low-risk-aversion short-horizon setting.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.PMmath.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marcos Escobar-Anel, Yevhen Havrylenko, Rudi Zagst. 2024-07-29. Value-at-Risk constrained portfolios in incomplete markets: a dynamic programming approach to Heston's model. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06390-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Entropic Value-at-Risk parity for tempered stable returns

We develop Entropic Value-at-Risk (EVaR) parity for tempered stable returns. EVaR-based inverse risk parity (IRP) and equal risk contribution (ERC) portfolios are constructed using multivariate normal tempered stable models and independent component analysis with tempered stable components. We derive the corresponding asset-level EVaR and EVaR-deviation contributions and use the latter to separate the fitted location term from EVaR risk contributions. Under Gaussian returns, EVaR-deviation IRP and ERC recover conventional volatility IRP and ERC weights. We evaluate the resulting portfolios in three investment universes. Empirically, EVaR-based ERC portfolios achieve positive Sharpe differences relative to equal weight across the universes.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Seasonal Trading in Commodity Futures: Evidence from Regression and Singular Spectrum Signals

Commodity futures are shaped by harvest cycles, weather shocks, storage conditions, and seasonal demand, but it remains unclear whether recurring patterns yield robust out-of-sample trading profits. Existing research documents return seasonality in commodity futures as well as more complex seasonal structure, while leaving less evidence on how alternative seasonal models compare under common implementation constraints. This article compares dummy-variable regression (DVR), Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA), and robust low-rank SSA (RLSSA) within a unified trading framework, including a volatility-normalised specification. Using monthly delivery-avoidance returns for 15 liquid commodity futures, the models are estimated on rolling ten-year windows and evaluated from 2016 to 2024 with transaction costs, an equal-weight long benchmark, and Maximum Entropy Bootstrap (MEB) assessment. Across 500 MEB paths, the benchmark has the strongest average full-period profile, with a cumulative return of 16.81%, a Sharpe ratio of 0.191, and a maximum drawdown of -0.414. Classical SSA has the strongest average model outcomes, but negative median cumulative returns and deep drawdowns indicate substantial path sensitivity. Volatility normalisation reduces the average DVR short loss but generally weakens SSA-based portfolios. None of the 18 approximate paired MEB Sharpe tests rejects after within-family Holm adjustment. Because MEB preserves each contract's temporal rank ordering, the assessment is conditional on observed timing rather than a timing-randomised seasonal null. The evidence does not establish robust benchmark outperformance and shows that model performance varies materially across market subperiods.

q-fin.PM↗
arXiv2026

Screening-Off Information and Conditional Risk in Portfolio Choice

Conditional portfolio models estimate risk relative to a chosen information set, yet rarely test whether that information removes common cross-asset dependence. When it does not, systematic risk may be treated as idiosyncratic, distorting portfolios and attainable efficient frontiers. We formulate this prior problem as screening-off for portfolio choice. A hierarchy separates causal, distributional and second-moment requirements, while an exact covariance decomposition distinguishes represented systematic response, omitted response risk and residual cross-asset dependence. The two representation errors have different financial implications: omitted response necessarily overstates attainable mean--variance opportunities, whereas incomplete screening can distort them in either direction. Exact finite perturbation identities and non-asymptotic bounds map both errors into changes in constrained portfolio weights and frontier potential. Controlled experiments verify the mechanisms under static, heavy-tailed, dynamic and nonlinear designs. Frozen out-of-sample market tests combine a broad universe of observable economic and financial drivers with 150 U.S. equities and 17 hedge-fund strategy indices. Compact selected representations materially reduce residual dependence in both panels; in equities, residual-aware covariance estimation improves materially on the uncorrected diagonal-residual restriction while remaining competitive with established covariance regularizers. The framework provides a falsifiable information criterion for conditional risk and a direct map from representation failure to portfolio instability.

q-fin.PM↗