arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2208.10522

Analytical Weak-lensing Shear Responses of Galaxy Properties and Galaxy Detection

Xiangchong Li·Rachel Mandelbaum
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Shear estimation bias from galaxy detection and blending identification is now recognized as an issue for ongoing and future weak lensing surveys. Currently, the empirical approach to correcting for this bias involves numerically shearing every observed galaxy and rerunning the detection and selection process. In this work, we provide an analytical correction for this bias that is accurate to subpercent level and far simpler to use. With the interpretation that smoothed image pixel values and galaxy properties are projections of the image signal onto a set of basis functions, we analytically derive the linear shear responses of both the pixel values and the galaxy properties (i.e., magnitude, size and shape) using the shear responses of the basis functions. With these derived shear responses, we correct for biases from shear-dependent galaxy detection and galaxy sample selection. With the analytical covariance matrix of measurement errors caused by image noise on pixel values and galaxy properties, we correct for the noise biases in galaxy shape measurement and the detection/selection process to the second-order in noise. The code used for this paper can carry out the detection, selection, and shear measurement for ~1000 galaxies per CPU second. The algorithm is tested with realistic image simulations, and we find, after the analytical correction (without relying on external image calibration) for the detection/selection bias of about $-4\%$, the multiplicative shear bias is $-0.12 \pm 0.10\%$ for isolated galaxies; and $-0.3 \pm 0.1\%$ for blended galaxies with Hyper Suprime-Cam observational condition.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.COastro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiangchong Li, Rachel Mandelbaum. 2023-03-23. Analytical Weak-lensing Shear Responses of Galaxy Properties and Galaxy Detection. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras%2Fstad890

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Constraints on the Thomson optical depth to the CMB from the Lyman-$α$ forest

We present the first constraints on the electron optical depth to reionization, $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$, from the Lyman-$α$ forest alone for physically motivated reionization models that match the reionization's end-point, $z_{\rm{end}}$, required by the same astrophysical probe, and for symmetric reionization models with fixed duration, $Δz$, commonly adopted in CMB reionization analyses. Compared to traditional estimates from the latter, the Lyman-$α$ forest traces the ionization state of the IGM through its coupling with the thermal state. We find an explicit mapping between the two solving the chemistry and temperature evolution equations for hydrogen and helium. Our results yield $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$=$0.040^{+0.042}_{-0.018}$ (95\% C.L) and $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$=$0.041^{+0.028}_{-0.017}$ for reionization models with $z_{\rm{end}}$ and $Δz$-fixed, respectively. With mock Lyman-$α$ forest data that mimics the precision of future larger quasar sample datasets, we would potentially obtain tighter $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$ constraints, paving the way for CMB-independent constraints on the epoch of reionization from a large-scale structure probe.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

Non-minimally Coupled Running Curvaton for DESI-motivated Dynamical Dark Energy

Recent DESI BAO data combined with CMB and supernova measurements suggest a dynamical dark energy that can cross the phantom divide. We show that introducing a non-minimal coupling $ξχ^2R$ to the running-curvaton framework allows a single field to drive early-universe curvature perturbations and late-time phantom-crossing cosmic acceleration without ghost instabilities. Using MCMC background likelihoods with DESI DR2 BAO, Pantheon+ SNe, and a reduced CMB prior, we constrain the cosmological parameters: $H_0 = 67.88^{+0.53}_{-0.61}\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$, $Ω_m = 0.3072^{+0.0059}_{-0.0054}$, $w_0 = -0.922^{+0.055}_{-0.063}$, and $w_a = -0.205^{+0.173}_{-0.182}$. Parameter degeneracies leave the coupling constants weakly constrained, highlighting the need for full perturbation-level analysis using CMB spectra and lensing.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Relation Between Field-Level Posteriors, Correlators, and their Likelihoods

We develop a field-level posterior for cosmological data by marginalizing over initial conditions and noise in a general forward model. While our focus is on large-scale structure data, the results generalize to any weakly non-Gaussian observable. Moreover, the construction is non-perturbative with respect to the forward model and applies equally well to perturbative calculations, simulation-based predictions, and more general effective descriptions. Expanding the FLP around its Gaussian limit, we derive a general expression for the Fisher matrix and reorganize the field-level information into contributions associated with the connected correlators of the evolved field. This makes explicit which terms are captured by likelihood analyses based on the power spectrum, the bispectrum, or finite sets of summary statistics, and which are lost under compression. We recover the standard Gaussian-covariance result for the power spectrum, show that the Gaussian bispectrum likelihood reproduces the corresponding field-level contribution, and show how cross-covariances among summaries progressively reconstruct more of the full field-level information. As an application to the BAO scale, we show how the field contains all the information required for its optimal reconstruction in the presence of noise, and identify the contributions in the FLP needed to attain this limit. We also show that the reconstruction of the initial field arises naturally as a byproduct of our approach, yielding the optimal estimate of the initial conditions given the data and the noise. Our results provide a unified framework to compare field-level and correlator-based inference, to quantify the information loss induced by compression, and to explore the role of stochasticity.

astro-ph.CO↗