Skill requirements in job advertisements: A comparison of skill-categorization methods based on explanatory power in wage regressions

Abstract

In this paper, we compare different methods to extract skill requirements from job advertisements. We consider three top-down methods that are based on expert-created dictionaries of keywords, and a bottom-up method of unsupervised topic modeling, the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model. We measure the skill requirements based on these methods using a U.K. dataset of job advertisements that contains over 1 million entries. We estimate the returns of the identified skills using wage regressions. Finally, we compare the different methods by the wage variation they can explain, assuming that better-identified skills will explain a higher fraction of the wage variation in the labor market. We find that the top-down methods perform worse than the LDA model, as they can explain only about 20% of the wage variation, while the LDA model explains about 45% of it.