arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2207.10889

Correlation Clustering with Sherali-Adams

Vincent Cohen-Addad·Euiwoong Lee·Alantha Newman
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a complete graph $G = (V, E)$ where each edge is labeled $+$ or $-$, the Correlation Clustering problem asks to partition $V$ into clusters to minimize the number of $+$edges between different clusters plus the number of $-$edges within the same cluster. Correlation Clustering has been used to model a large number of clustering problems in practice, making it one of the most widely studied clustering formulations. The approximability of Correlation Clustering has been actively investigated [BBC04, CGW05, ACN08], culminating in a $2.06$-approximation algorithm [CMSY15], based on rounding the standard LP relaxation. Since the integrality gap for this formulation is 2, it has remained a major open question to determine if the approximation factor of 2 can be reached, or even breached. In this paper, we answer this question affirmatively by showing that there exists a $(1.994 + \epsilon)$-approximation algorithm based on $O(1/\epsilon^2$) rounds of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy. In order to round a solution to the Sherali-Adams relaxation, we adapt the {\em correlated rounding} originally developed for CSPs [BRS11, GS11, RT12]. With this tool, we reach an approximation ratio of $2+\epsilon$ for Correlation Clustering. To breach this ratio, we go beyond the traditional triangle-based analysis by employing a global charging scheme that amortizes the total cost of the rounding across different triangles.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vincent Cohen-Addad, Euiwoong Lee, Alantha Newman. 2022-07-22. Correlation Clustering with Sherali-Adams. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10889

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗