arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2206.06220

ZFC without power set II: Reflection strikes back

Victoria Gitman·Richard Matthews
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The theory ZFC implies the scheme that for every cardinal $\delta$ we can make $\delta$ many dependent choices over any definable relation without terminal nodes. Friedman, the first author, and Kanovei constructed a model of ZFC$^-$ (ZFC without power set) with largest cardinal $\omega$ in which this principle fails for $\omega$ many choices. In this article we study failures of dependent choice principles over ZFC$^-$ by considering the notion of big proper classes. A proper class is said to be big if it surjects onto every non-zero ordinal. We shall see that if one assumes the scheme of dependent choices of any arbitrary set length then every proper class is indeed big. However, by building on work of Zarach, we provide a general framework for separating dependent choice schemes of various lengths by producing models of ZFC$^-$ with proper classes that are not big. Using a similar idea, we then extend the earlier result by producing a model of ZFC$^-$ in which there are unboundedly many cardinals but the scheme of dependent choices of length $\omega$ still fails. Finally, the second author has proven that a model of ZFC$^-$ cannot have a non-trivial, cofinal, elementary self-embedding for which the von-Neumann hierarchy exists up to its critical point. We answer a related question posed by the second author by showing that the existence of such an embedding need not imply the existence of any non-trivial fragment of the von-Neumann hierarchy. In particular, that in such a situation $\mathcal{P}(\omega)$ can be a proper class.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Victoria Gitman, Richard Matthews. 2022-06-13. ZFC without power set II: Reflection strikes back. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06220

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗