arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2206.05174

Near-Optimal Distributed Dominating Set in Bounded Arboricity Graphs

Abstract

We describe a simple deterministic $O( \varepsilon^{-1} \log \Delta)$ round distributed algorithm for $(2\alpha+1)(1 + \varepsilon)$ approximation of minimum weighted dominating set on graphs with arboricity at most $\alpha$. Here $\Delta$ denotes the maximum degree. We also show a lower bound proving that this round complexity is nearly optimal even for the unweighted case, via a reduction from the celebrated KMW lower bound on distributed vertex cover approximation [Kuhn, Moscibroda, and Wattenhofer JACM'16]. Our algorithm improves on all the previous results (that work only for unweighted graphs) including a randomized $O(\alpha^2)$ approximation in $O(\log n)$ rounds [Lenzen and Wattenhofer DISC'10], a deterministic $O(\alpha \log \Delta)$ approximation in $O(\log \Delta)$ rounds [Lenzen and Wattenhofer DISC'10], a deterministic $O(\alpha)$ approximation in $O(\log^2 \Delta)$ rounds [implicit in Bansal and Umboh IPL'17 and Kuhn, Moscibroda, and Wattenhofer SODA'06], and a randomized $O(\alpha)$ approximation in $O(\alpha\log n)$ rounds [Morgan, Solomon and Wein DISC'21]. We also provide a randomized $O(\alpha \log\Delta)$ round distributed algorithm that sharpens the approximation factor to $\alpha(1+o(1))$. If each node is restricted to do polynomial-time computations, our approximation factor is tight in the first order as it is NP-hard to achieve $\alpha - 1 - \varepsilon$ approximation [Bansal and Umboh IPL'17].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michal Dory, Mohsen Ghaffari, Saeed Ilchi. 2022-06-10. Near-Optimal Distributed Dominating Set in Bounded Arboricity Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.05174

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS