Learning Mathematics through incorrect Problems

Hugo Caerols-Palma; Katia Vogt-Geisse

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2206.00068

Learning Mathematics through incorrect Problems

Hugo Caerols-Palma·Katia Vogt-Geisse

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this article we describe special type of mathematical problems that may help develop teaching methods that motivate students to explore patterns, formulate conjectures and find solutions without only memorizing formulas and procedures. These are problems that either their solutions do not make sense in a real life context and/or provide a contradiction during the solution process. In this article we call these problems incorrect problems. We show several examples that can be applied in undergraduate mathematics courses and provide possible ways these examples can be used to motivate critical mathematical thinking. We also discuss the results of exposing a group of 168 undergraduate engineering students to an incorrect problem in a Differential Equations course. This experience provided us with important insight on how well prepared our students are to "out of the box" thinking and on the importance of previous mathematical skills in order to master further mathematical analysis to solve such a problem.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Hugo Caerols-Palma, Katia Vogt-Geisse. 2022-05-31. Learning Mathematics through incorrect Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00068

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗

arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗