arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2205.15874

On Maximizing Sums of Non-monotone Submodular and Linear Functions

Abstract

We study the problem of Regularized Unconstrained Submodular Maximization (RegularizedUSM) as defined by Bodek and Feldman [BF22]. In this problem, you are given a non-monotone non-negative submodular function $f:2^{\mathcal N}\to \mathbb R_{\ge 0}$ and a linear function $\ell:2^{\mathcal N}\to \mathbb R$ over the same ground set $\mathcal N$, and the objective is to output a set $T\subseteq \mathcal N$ approximately maximizing the sum $f(T)+\ell(T)$. Specifically, an algorithm is said to provide an $(\alpha,\beta)$-approximation for RegularizedUSM if it outputs a set $T$ such that $\mathbb E[f(T)+\ell(T)]\ge \max_{S\subseteq \mathcal N}[\alpha \cdot f(S)+\beta\cdot \ell(S)]$. We also study the setting where $S$ and $T$ are subject to a matroid constraint, which we refer to as Regularized Constrained Submodular Maximization (RegularizedCSM). For both RegularizedUSM and RegularizedCSM, we provide improved $(\alpha,\beta)$-approximation algorithms for the cases of non-positive $\ell$, non-negative $\ell$, and unconstrained $\ell$. In particular, for the case of unconstrained $\ell$, we are the first to provide nontrivial $(\alpha,\beta)$-approximations for RegularizedCSM, and the $\alpha$ we obtain for RegularizedUSM is superior to that of [BF22] for all $\beta\in (0,1)$. In addition to approximation algorithms, we provide improved inapproximability results for all of the aforementioned cases. In particular, we show that the $\alpha$ our algorithm obtains for RegularizedCSM with unconstrained $\ell$ is tight for $\beta\ge \frac{e}{e+1}$. We also show 0.478-inapproximability for maximizing a submodular function where $S$ and $T$ are subject to a cardinality constraint, improving the long-standing 0.491-inapproximability result due to Gharan and Vondrak [GV10].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Benjamin Qi. 2022-05-31. On Maximizing Sums of Non-monotone Submodular and Linear Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15874

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS