arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2205.13077

Many Sequential Iterative Algorithms Can Be Parallel and (Nearly) Work-efficient

Zheqi Shen·Zijin Wan·Yan Gu·Yihan Sun
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To design efficient parallel algorithms, some recent papers showed that many sequential iterative algorithms can be directly parallelized but there are still challenges in achieving work-efficiency and high-parallelism. Work-efficiency can be hard for certain problems where the number of dependences is asymptotically more than optimal sequential work bound. To achieve high-parallelism, we want to process as many objects as possible in parallel. The goal is to achieve $\tilde{O}(D)$ span for a problem with the deepest dependence length $D$. We refer to this property as round-efficiency. In this paper, we show work-efficient and round-efficient algorithms for a variety of classic problems and propose general approaches to do so. To efficiently parallelize many sequential iterative algorithms, we propose the phase-parallel framework. The framework assigns a rank to each object and processes them accordingly. All objects with the same rank can be processed in parallel. To enable work-efficiency and high parallelism, we use two types of general techniques. Type 1 algorithms aim to use range queries to extract all objects with the same rank, such that we avoid evaluating all the dependences. We discuss activity selection, unlimited knapsack, and more using Type 1 framework. Type 2 algorithms aim to wake up an object when the last object it depends on is finished. We discuss activity selection, longest increasing subsequence (LIS), and many other algorithms using Type 2 framework. All of our algorithms are (nearly) work-efficient and round-efficient. Many of them improve previous best bounds, and some of them are the first to achieve work-efficiency with round-efficiency. We also implement many of them. On inputs with reasonable dependence depth, our algorithms are highly parallelized and significantly outperform their sequential counterparts.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zheqi Shen, Zijin Wan, Yan Gu, Yihan Sun. 2022-05-25. Many Sequential Iterative Algorithms Can Be Parallel and (Nearly) Work-efficient. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490148.3538574

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗