arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2204.12488

Distances Release with Differential Privacy in Tree and Grid Graph

Abstract

Data about individuals may contain private and sensitive information. The differential privacy (DP) was proposed to address the problem of protecting the privacy of each individual while keeping useful information about a population. Sealfon (2016) introduced a private graph model in which the graph topology is assumed to be public while the weight information is assumed to be private. That model can express hidden congestion patterns in a known transportation system. In this paper, we revisit the problem of privately releasing approximate distances between all pairs of vertices in (Sealfon 2016). Our goal is to minimize the additive error, namely the difference between the released distance and actual distance under private setting. We propose improved solutions to that problem for several cases. For the problem of privately releasing all-pairs distances, we show that for tree with depth $h$, we can release all-pairs distances with additive error $O(\log^{1.5} h \cdot \log^{1.5} V)$ for fixed privacy parameter where $V$ the number of vertices in the tree, which improves the previous error bound $O(\log^{2.5} V)$, since the size of $h$ can be as small as $O(\log V)$. Our result implies that a $\log V$ factor is saved, and the additive error in tree can be smaller than the error on array/path. Additionally, for the grid graph with arbitrary edge weights, we also propose a method to release all-pairs distances with additive error $\tilde O(V^{3/4}) $ for fixed privacy parameters. On the application side, many cities like Manhattan are composed of horizontal streets and vertical avenues, which can be modeled as a grid graph.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chenglin Fan, Ping Li. 2022-04-26. Distances Release with Differential Privacy in Tree and Grid Graph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12488

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS