arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2204.09178

Counting and enumerating optimum cut sets for hypergraph $k$-partitioning problems for fixed $k$

Calvin Beideman·Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran·Weihang Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the problem of enumerating optimal solutions for two hypergraph $k$-partitioning problems -- namely, Hypergraph-$k$-Cut and Minmax-Hypergraph-$k$-Partition. The input in hypergraph $k$-partitioning problems is a hypergraph $G=(V, E)$ with positive hyperedge costs along with a fixed positive integer $k$. The goal is to find a partition of $V$ into $k$ non-empty parts $(V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k)$ -- known as a $k$-partition -- so as to minimize an objective of interest. 1. If the objective of interest is the maximum cut value of the parts, then the problem is known as Minmax-Hypergraph-$k$-Partition. A subset of hyperedges is a minmax-$k$-cut-set if it is the subset of hyperedges crossing an optimum $k$-partition for Minmax-Hypergraph-$k$-Partition. 2. If the objective of interest is the total cost of hyperedges crossing the $k$-partition, then the problem is known as Hypergraph-$k$-Cut. A subset of hyperedges is a min-$k$-cut-set if it is the subset of hyperedges crossing an optimum $k$-partition for Hypergraph-$k$-Cut. We give the first polynomial bound on the number of minmax-$k$-cut-sets and a polynomial-time algorithm to enumerate all of them in hypergraphs for every fixed $k$. Our technique is strong enough to also enable an $n^{O(k)}p$-time deterministic algorithm to enumerate all min-$k$-cut-sets in hypergraphs, thus improving on the previously known $n^{O(k^2)}p$-time deterministic algorithm, where $n$ is the number of vertices and $p$ is the size of the hypergraph. The correctness analysis of our enumeration approach relies on a structural result that is a strong and unifying generalization of known structural results for Hypergraph-$k$-Cut and Minmax-Hypergraph-$k$-Partition. We believe that our structural result is likely to be of independent interest in the theory of hypergraphs (and graphs).

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Calvin Beideman, Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran, Weihang Wang. 2023-03-07. Counting and enumerating optimum cut sets for hypergraph $k$-partitioning problems for fixed $k$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.09178

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗