arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2204.05718

Root systems & Clifford algebras: from symmetries of viruses to $E_8$ & ADE correspondences

Pierre-Philippe Dechant
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we discuss reflection groups and root systems, in particular non-crystallographic ones, and a Clifford algebra framework for both these concepts. A review of historical as well as more recent work on viral capsid symmetries motivates the focus on the icosahedral root system $H_3$. We discuss a notion of affine extension for non-crystallographic groups with applications to fullerenes and viruses. The icosahedrally ordered component of the nucleic acid within the virus capsid and the interaction between the two have shed light on the viral assembly process with interesting applications to antiviral therapies, drug delivery and nanotechnology. The Clifford algebra framework is very natural, as it uses precisely the structure that is already implicit in this root system and reflection group context, i.e. a vector space with an inner product. In addition, it affords a uniquely simple reflection formula, a double cover of group transformations, and more insight into the geometry, e.g. the geometry of the Coxeter plane. This approach made possible a range of root system induction proofs, such as the constructions of $E_8$ from $H_3$ and the exceptional 4D root systems from 3D root systems. This makes explicit various connections between what Arnold called Trinities (sets of three exceptional cases). In fact this generalises further since the induction construction contains additional cases, namely two infinite families of cases. It therefore actually yields $ADE$ correspondences between three sets of different mathematical concepts that are usually thought of separately as polytopes, subgroups of $SU(2)$ and $ADE$ Lie algebras. Here we connect them explicitly and in a unified way by thinking of them as three different sets of root systems.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.GRmath.MPmath.QAq-bio.BM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pierre-Philippe Dechant. 2022-04-12. Root systems & Clifford algebras: from symmetries of viruses to $E_8$ & ADE correspondences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05718

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗